SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Bom) 1959

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SUMAN SHYAM, S.M.MODAK, JJ.
Brajendra Kumar Singh @ Kshatriya Brajendra Singh And Ors. - Petitioners 
Versus 
The Learned Collector And District Magistrate, Mumbai City And Ors. - Respondents 
Writ Petition (L) No. 40050 Of 2025 
Decided On : 09-12-2025

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant :Mr. Anil V. Anturkar, Senior Advocate, With Mr. Prithviraj S. Gole, Mr. Gaurav Choubey And Mr. Siddhesh Pednekar
For the Respondent:Mr. Suraj Gupte, AGP., Mr. Girish Godbole, Senior Advocate with Mr. G. D. Talreja and Mr. Rahul Mantri

Statutory remedies should be exhausted before seeking writ relief; election eligibility must adhere to defined criteria as per issued Circulars.

Headnote:(A) Multi State Co-operative Societies Act, 2002 - Section 84(2)(c) - Railways Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 - Rule 15(1)(c) - Election process of the Jackson Co-operative Credit Society with nomination rejection based on a Circular dated 27th February, 2020. Petitioners sought to contest elections but nominations were rejected for not fulfilling conditions in the Circular concerning tenure of office. (Paras 1-6)

(B) Legal principles - The requirement of obtaining permission from the employer for election participation does not negate eligibility for nomination. Writ court should not interfere when statutory remedies exist for election disputes. (Paras 13-17)

(C) Final decision allows examination of lower court issues regarding Circular validity while rejecting the interim relief sought by Petitioners. (Paras 18-22)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners are employees of a co-operative society who contested their nomination rejection based on tenure restrictions for holding office as outlined in a government circular. Prior permissions from their employer had been granted.

Findings of Court:
The court noted the election process has started, and petitioners can seek relief for election disputes under Section 84(2)(c).

Issues: The main issues were the validity of the Circular dated 27th February, 2020 regarding election eligibility and the correct procedural approach for contesting rejections.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that where an alternative statutory remedy exists, interference through a writ petition is disfavored, even amidst larger legal issues pending resolution regarding Circular enforcement.

Result: Interim relief declined; notice issued to respondents. Petition to be heard on 27th January, 2026.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for election participation based on prior terms. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments against nomination rejection and circular validity. (Para 4 , 6 , 11 , 12)
3. court's reasoning on election process and statutory remedy. (Para 10 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 18)
4. writ court's reluctance to intervene with statutory remedies. (Para 17)
5. next steps and implications for election proceedings. (Para 19 , 22 , 23)

Judgment :

Not on board. Taken on production board.

1. The seven Petitioners herein are the members of the Respondent No.5 i.e. The Jackson Co-operative Credit Society of the employees of the Western Railway Limited, which is a Multi State Co-operative Society. The elections in the society are scheduled to be held on 22nd December, 2025. As per Rule 15(1)(c) of The Railways Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966, the Petitioners being Railways’ employees, who have held more than two elective terms in the office of the society, are required to obtain permissions from the employer for participating /contesting the elections. There is a Circular dated 27th February, 2020, which restricts the members who have held more than two terms, from contesting the elections of the society.

2. The Circular dated 27th February, 2020 provides that the government servants can hold elective office in any body in their entire career for a period of two terms or for a period of five years, whichever is earlier. The criteria laid down by the Circular dated 27th February, 2020 is in modification of similar criteria laid down in the earlier Office Memorandum dated 5th August, 2019, wherein, the embargo was for two terms or four years.

3. The Petitioners had earlier not be granted permission to participate / contest the election. As such, they had approached this Court by filing Writ Petition (L) No.33706 of 2025 inter-alia assailing the Circulars dated 5th August, 2019 as well as 27th February, 2020. However, during the pendency of the Writ Petition, the Petitioners had, with the leave of the Court, submitted applications seeking sanction of the authorities under Rule 15(1) (c). Such sanction was granted by order dated 27th November, 2025. Therefore, Writ Petition (L) No.33706 of 2025 was withdrawn by the Petitioners with liberty to approach again as and when a fresh cause of action arises.

4. The Respondent No.1 i.e. the Collector and District Magistrate, Mumbai City has been appointed as Returning Officer to conduct the election of the Respondent No.5-Society and the election schedule of the society has also been notified fixing the date of election on 22nd December, 2025. The Petitioners had submitted their nominations. However, by the communication dated 8th December, 2025, their nominations stood rejected. The ground for rejection of the nominations, as indicated in the letter dated 8th December, 2025, is on account of the fact that the Petitioners did not meet the requirement of Circular dated 27th February, 2020 issued by the Department of Personnel and Training, Ministry of Personnel, Government of India. Aggrieved thereby the present Writ Petition has been filed inter-alia assailing the validity of the Circular dated 27th February 2020. By way of interim relief, the Petitioners have sought a direction upon the Respondent No.1 / Returning Officer to provisionally accept their nominations and allow them to contest the election scheduled to be held on 22nd December, 2025.

5. The prayers made in Writ Petition are extracted herein below for ready reference:-

“a) By an appropriate Writ and/or direction and/or order of this Hon’ble Court, the letter/communication dated 08/12/2025 under reference no. RO/JCCS-BOD/ Election/2025-3030/20 issued by Respondent no.1 (annexed to the petition at Exh.L) be quashed and set aside and Respondent no.1 be directed to publish fresh list of valid nominations by including the name of the petitioners herein;

b) By an appropriate Writ and/or direction and/or order, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to hold and declare th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top