IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Chandrakant Shinde – Appellant
Versus
Chairman Maharashtra Gramin Bank CIDCO, Aurangabad – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the Petition is taken up for final hearing and disposal.
2. Petitioner has filed the present Petition challenging Part-I Award dated 22 January 2020 passed by the learned Presiding Officer, Central Government Industrial Tribunal-2, Mumbai (CGIT) holding that the enquiry conducted against the Petitioner is fair and proper and that the findings of the Enquiry Officer are not perverse.
3. Maharashtra Gramin Bank is a Regional Rural Bank (RRB) established under the Regional Rural Banks Act, 1976. Government of India vide Notification dated 25 March 2008 amalgamated the two RRBs i.e. Aurangabad Jalna Gramin Bank & Thane Gramin Bank into a single RRB named Maharashtra Godavari Gramin Bank. Maharashtra Gramin Bank came into existence on 20 July 2009 after amalgamation of erstwhile Maharashtra Godavari Gramin Bank and Marathawada Gramin Bank. Respondent-Bank is sponsored by the Bank of Maharashtra. The share capital of the Bank is contributed by Government of India, Government of Maharashtra and Bank of Maharashtra.
4. Petitioner was appointed as Clerk i
U.P. State Electricity Board & Anr. vs. Hari Shankar Jain & Ors.
Disciplinary proceedings must adhere to statutory provisions; if Service Regulations are not notified under Section 13B of the Act, Model Standing Orders apply and render any contrary action void.
(1) Protection of Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 cannot be denied to a workman merely for reason that employer grants him other services benefits such as pension, gratuity etc. und....
The court emphasized that constitutional challenges must be supported by clear pleadings, and the amendment by TRANSCO was valid as it fell within its regulatory powers.
Order of punishment legally passed by competent authority, cannot be interfered with.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the petitioners to the benefits of Regulation 30-A, the discriminatory nature of the rejection orders, and the violation of A....
Regulations regarding the dismissal and removal of municipal executive officers were found ultra vires, as they exceeded the authority defined in the Municipalities Act, particularly around dismissal....
The power to regulate conditions of service under the Act is legislative in nature, allowing unilateral modification without employee consent or fair hearing.
Departmental proceedings against retired employees must comply with Article 351-A, requiring Governor's sanction and adherence to time limits for validity.
Annual increments are an accrued right for employees, which cannot be denied without adherence to statutory procedures and principles of natural justice.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.