IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S.KULKARNI, AARTI SATHE, JJ.
Nivara Infradevelopers LLP, through Designated Partner Mr.Nilesh Patil - Appellant
Vs.
The Union of India - Respondent
Writ Petition (L) No.7888 of 2026
Decided On : 02-04-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges gst provisional bank attachments (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. attachment requires opinion based on tangible material (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arbitrary attachments warrant officer costs (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. orders quashed for lacking procedural safeguards (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. draconian powers prevent revenue interest abuse (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. impose costs; permit future show cause notice (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
(G.S.Kulkarni, J.)
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for the following substantive reliefs :
(c) that the Hon'ble Court be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or any other writ, direction or order quashing and setting aside the Impugned Orders dated 23 January 2026 being Exhibits A and B to this Petition;
(d) pending the hearing and final disposal of the present Petition, the Hon'ble Court may be pleased to stay the operation of the Impugned Orders dated 23 January 2026 being Exhibits A and B to this Petition and consequently direct the Respondent No.4 to forthwith withdraw the attachment of the bank accounts.”
2. The grievance of the Petitioner is primarily against the impugned orders of attachment dated 23rd January 2026 (Exhibits A and B respectively). The impugned orders are intimation to the Petitioner’s bankers namely Punjab National Bank, Mumbai and Saraswat Co-operative Bank Limited, Mumbai attaching the bank accounts of the Petitioner. One of such intimation issued to Punjab National Bank is extracted below :
“Government of Maharashtra
Department of Goods and Service Tax
Office of The,
Joint Commissioner of State Tax, .
Investigation-A,
C-Wlng, 2nd Floor, Old Building,, GST Bhavan, Mazgaon,
Mumbai-400010
No/JCST/lNV-A/ M/s. Nivara Infradevelopers LLP /DRC-22/2025-26/E-118
Mumbai Dated 23-01-2026
“FORM GST DRC- 22"
(See rule 159[1])
To,
The Manager,
Punjab National Bank,
Samartha Mandir, Bhalerao Wadi, Hanuman Road,
Vileparle East, Mumbai, Maharashtra - 400057.
IFSC: PUNB0373600
Account No: 3736002101019575
Provisional attachment of Bank Account under section 83
It is to inform that M/s. Nivara lnfradevelopers LLP (GSTIN- 27AAKFN9501B1ZF) having principal place of business at CTS No.185 185/1 to 8 , Jalmeena Chs , Tejpal Scheme, Road No.5 Junction , Vile Parle East , Mumbai Suburban, Maharashtra-400057 bearing registration number as 27AAKFN9501B1ZF, PAN AAKFN9501B is a registered taxable person under the MGST/CGST Act.2017. Mr. Prasad Shantaram Patil and Mr. Nilesh Shantaram Patil are the partners of M/s. Nivara lnfradevelopers LLP. Proceedings have been launched against the aforesaid taxable person under section 67(2) of the said Act to determine the tax or any other amount due from the said person. As per information available with the department, it has come to my notice that the said person has account in your bank having account no.3736002101019575.
In order to protect the interests of revenue and in exercise of the powers conferred under section 83 of the Act, I Prerna Deshbhratar (IAS), Joint Commissioner of State Tax, Investigation-A, hereby provisionally attach the aforesaid account.
No debit shall be allowed to be made from the said account or any other account operated by the aforesaid person on the same PAI\: without the prior permission of this department.
Prerna Deshbhratar (IAS]
Joint Commissioner of State Tax,
lnvestigation-A, Mumbai.
1) Deputy Commissioner of State Tax, Inv-A (E-0101)
2) Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Inv-A, (D-0103)
3) M/s. Nivara lnfradevelopers LLP.”
3. It appears from the record that on the even date, i.e. on 23rd January 2026, the Petitioner was issued a pre-attachment communication in DRC-23, however, on the very same day, the impugned attachment notices to the Petitioner’s bankers, as extracted hereinabove, came to be issued.
4. It is Petitioner’s contention that on a plain reading of the impugned notice, as also the pre-intimation to the attachment, which is dated 23rd January 2026, it is clear that basic principles of law are not follo
Provisional attachment under Section 83 of GST Act invalid without proper officer forming and recording opinion, based on tangible material, that it is necessary for revenue protection prior to order....
Provisional attachment of bank accounts under GST Section 83 is invalid absent recorded opinion based on tangible material showing necessity to protect revenue; strict compliance mandatory, non-adher....
The court emphasized the need for strict compliance with the statutory pre-conditions for the exercise of the power of provisional attachment under Section 110(5) of the Customs Act.
The necessity of the formation of opinion by the Commissioner, the live nexus to the purpose of protecting the interest of the government revenue, and the existence of tangible material before the Co....
, time can be extended for a further period of six month. Appropriate order for extension of period of provisional attachment would only be passed upon satisfaction of the criteria listed out. An inj....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.