IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ARIF S.DOCTOR
Sadanand Sarvankar – Appellant
Versus
Mahesh Baliram Sawant – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.
1. The present Interim Application has been filed under the provisions of Section 86 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 (“R.P. Act") read with Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ("CPC"), seeking dismissal of the captioned Election Petition.
2. Before adverting to the rival contentions, it is useful for context to set out the following facts, which are not in dispute, viz.,
2.1. The Applicant and the Respondent No. 1, i.e., the Petitioner in the captioned Election Petition, were both candidates from Constituency No. 181, i.e., the Mahim Constituency, in the 15th Maharashtra Legislative Assembly elections, which were held on 20th November 2024 (“the Election"). For the sake of convenience, Respondent No. 1 to this Application shall be referred to as the Petitioner in this Order.
2.2. The results of the Election were declared on 23rd November 2024, and the Applicant was declared the returned candidate with 50,213 votes, whereas the Petitioner polled 48,897 votes, which was the second highest number of votes polled.
2.3 It is the Petitioner's case that the Applicant had, in the Affidavit (Form 26) which is attached to the Nominatio
Karim Uddin Barbhuiya v. Aminul Haque Laskar and Others
G. V. Sreerama Reddy & Anr. v. Returning Officer & Ors.
Anil Vasudev Salgaonkar v. Naresh Kushali Shirgaonkar
Murarka Radhey Shyam Ram Kumar v. Roop Singh Rathore
Sitaram v. Radhye Shyam Vishnav and Others
Election petition invalid if security for costs not deposited by petitioner at presentation; defect incurable despite later deposit. Non-disclosure of minor cases not corrupt practice without pleadin....
Important Point :Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices; failure to comply results in dismissal.
Election petitions must plead concise material facts under Section 83(1)(a) RP Act to disclose cause of action; deficient, vague pleadings warrant dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC without trial.
An election petition must disclose material facts to establish a cause of action; vague allegations are insufficient for dismissal, and substantial compliance with procedural rules is mandated.
Election petitions must be filed within 45 days of election results; failure to comply with statutory requirements leads to dismissal.
An election petition may be rejected if it fails to comply with mandatory pleading requirements regarding concise statements of material facts and particulars of corrupt practices as per the Represen....
Election petitions alleging affidavit suppression must plead full corrupt practice particulars including pendency and material election result effect for improper acceptance; deficiency invites Order....
Failure to comply with statutory requirements regarding material facts and submission of integral documents renders an election petition dismissible at the threshold.
Improper presentation of an election petition due to non-compliance with statutory signing requirements leads to its dismissal.
Election petitions must contain concise statements of material facts; omission of a single material fact leads to dismissal for lack of cause of action.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.