Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ASHWIN D.BHOBE
Virendranath B. Tiwari – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition to quash sc/st act fir for alleged assault. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. parties argue misuse vs applicability of atrocities act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 22) |
| 3. fir lacks ingredients of sections 3(1)(r) and (s). (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. mere caste knowledge insufficient for section 3(1)(r). (Para 17 , 18) |
| 5. simple hurt excludes ipc 324 and 3(2)(va). (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. prior acquittals show vexatious revengeful proceedings. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. bhajan lal principles justify quashing fir. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. fir and chargesheet quashed without costs. (Para 29 , 30) |
JUDGMENT :
ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J.
1. This proceeding is recorded in accordance with the decision of this Court in Hema Suresh Ahuja & Ors v. State of Maharashtra & Anr., (2024) SCC OnLine Bom 784 as the subject matter pertains to an offence under the SC/ST Act.
2. Heard Mr. Virendranath Tiwari, Petitioner in person, Mr. Sukanta Karmakar, learned APP for the Respondent – State, and Mr. Rizwan Merchant, learned Advocate for Respondent No. 2.
3. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, together with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is filed by the
FIR under SC/ST Act quashed absent caste-based insult, humiliation intent linked to caste, or cognizable offence ingredients; prior similar vexatious complaints indicate abuse of process for revenge.
The court quashed proceedings under the SC/ST Act due to lack of public view in the alleged incident, emphasizing the need for specific ingredients to establish the offence.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need to prevent the misuse of the provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and to discourage dis....
The court emphasized that an FIR under the SC/ST Act requires the humiliation of a SC/ST member to occur in public view; allegations must substantiate a cognizable offense.
The court ruled that allegations of caste-based abuse in public view under the SC & ST Act cannot be quashed without trial, emphasizing the need for intent to humiliate linked to caste identity.
The absence of public view during the alleged incident and lack of independent witnesses led to the quashing of the FIR under the Atrocity Act and IPC.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
