IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Jupicos Entertainment Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Probability Sports (India) Private Limited – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1) The disputes relating to right of participation in a cricket league are sought to be arbitrated by one of the team owners against the conductor of the league as well against the Mumbai Cricket Association, under whose aegis the league is conducted.
2) This is an application filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) for appointment of an arbitrator for adjudication of disputes and differences, which are said to have arisen between Applicant and Respondents under the Participation Agreement dated 9 March 2018. The disputes between the parties relate to Applicant’s right to participate in T20 Mumbai League (League) organised by Respondent No.1 under the aegis of Mumbai Cricket Association (Respondent No.2). There is no dispute about the existence of arbitration agreement between the Applicant and Respondent No.1, who are signatories to the Participation Agreement dated 9 March 2018. However, Respondent No.2 has opposed its impleadment to the arbitration on the ground that it is a non-signatory to the Participation Agreement. Respondent No.1, though does not dispute existence of arbitration agreement with the
Cox and Kings Ltd. vs. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.
M.R. Engineers and Contractors Private Limited vs. Som Datt Builders Limited
NBCC (India) Ltd. vs. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. Gangavaram Port Ltd.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) & Anr. Vs. Nortel Networks India Private Limited
Ameet Lalchand Shah and Ors. vs. Rishabh Enterprises and Anr.
Chloro Controls India (P) Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
ONGC Ltd. v. Discovery Enterprises (P) Ltd.
SBI General Insurance Company Limited vs. Krish Spinning
Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh Versus. ASAP Fluids Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Non-signatory held veritable party to arbitration agreement via active contract performance, composite transaction with supplementary agreement, and conduct, justifying joinder under Section 11; limi....
Dissenting non-signatory member of cooperative society not bound by arbitration clause in development agreement with developer; lacks consent as veritable party despite beneficiary status or executin....
A non-signatory to an arbitration agreement cannot invoke the arbitration clause of the agreement to which it is not a party.
subject matter of suit cannot be bifurcated by leaving one portion of the dispute to be decided in the suit while referring part of a dispute between the parties to the Partnership Deed containing th....
Scope of an arbitration agreement is limited to the parties who entered into it and those claiming under or through them, Courts under English Law have, in certain cases, also applied the 'Group of C....
Arbitration agreement –Clause-24 of the Brewing Agreement, which provides that the Arbitral Tribunal shall consist of three Arbitrators and that one Arbitrator shall be appointed by each of the parti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.