IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Jupicos Entertainment Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Probability Sports (India) Private Limited – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputes over league participation rights under arbitration. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. participation and supplementary agreements executed with mca. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. termination, post-termination conduct, arbitration invoked. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. mca as veritable party via doctrine and composite transaction. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. no arbitration agreement; claims time-barred. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. mca's dominant role in pa and league conduct. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. supplementary agreement supplements pa, binds mca. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30) |
| 8. mca participated in pa performance post-termination. (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 9. cox & kings: non-signatory as veritable party. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 10. composite transaction binds mca to arbitration clause. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 11. prior proceedings' observations non-binding on arbitration. (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54) |
| 12. limitation deferred to arbitrator. (Para 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
| 13. sole arbitrator appointed for disputes. (Para 60 , 61 , 62) |
JUDGMENT :
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.
1) The disputes relating to right of participation in a cricket league are soug
Cox and Kings Ltd. vs. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. and Anr.
ASF Buildtech Pvt. Ltd. vs. Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Pvt. Ltd.
M.R. Engineers and Contractors Private Limited vs. Som Datt Builders Limited
NBCC (India) Ltd. vs. Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd.
Duro Felguera, S.A. vs. Gangavaram Port Ltd.
Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) & Anr. Vs. Nortel Networks India Private Limited
Ameet Lalchand Shah and Ors. vs. Rishabh Enterprises and Anr.
Chloro Controls India (P) Ltd. v. Severn Trent Water Purification Inc.
ONGC Ltd. v. Discovery Enterprises (P) Ltd.
SBI General Insurance Company Limited vs. Krish Spinning
Aslam Ismail Khan Deshmukh Versus. ASAP Fluids Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
Non-signatory held veritable party to arbitration agreement via active contract performance, composite transaction with supplementary agreement, and conduct, justifying joinder under Section 11; limi....
Dissenting non-signatory member of cooperative society not bound by arbitration clause in development agreement with developer; lacks consent as veritable party despite beneficiary status or executin....
A non-signatory to an arbitration agreement cannot invoke the arbitration clause of the agreement to which it is not a party.
subject matter of suit cannot be bifurcated by leaving one portion of the dispute to be decided in the suit while referring part of a dispute between the parties to the Partnership Deed containing th....
Scope of an arbitration agreement is limited to the parties who entered into it and those claiming under or through them, Courts under English Law have, in certain cases, also applied the 'Group of C....
Arbitration agreement –Clause-24 of the Brewing Agreement, which provides that the Arbitral Tribunal shall consist of three Arbitrators and that one Arbitrator shall be appointed by each of the parti....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.