IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
SANDEEP V.MARNE
Space Master Realtors – Appellant
Versus
Mulund Sandhyaprakash CHS Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arbitrability of disputes with non-signatory society member (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background of redevelopment dispute (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. applicant's arguments on veritable party (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. respondent's opposition to arbitration binding (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 5. analysis of arbitration clause scope (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. no disputes arise from paaa (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38) |
| 7. review of prior judgments on non-signatories (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 8. third-party beneficiary not bound by arbitration (Para 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62) |
| 9. dissenting member not veritable party (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89) |
| 10. no incorporation of da arbitration in paaa (Para 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101) |
| 11. member individuality exceptions inapplicable (Para 102 , 103) |
| 12. referral court examines non-signatory prima facie (Para 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110) |
| 13. no arbitration |

M.C. Chacko vs. State Bank of Travancore, Trivandrum
Cox and Kings Limited Versus. SAP India Private Limited and another
Ajay Madhusudan Patel and others vs. Jyotrindra S Patel and others
Giriraj Garg Versus. Coal India Limited and Ors.
Daman Singh and Others. Versus. State of Punjab and Others
ASF Build-tech Private Ltd. Versus. Shapoorji Pallonji & Co. Pvt. Limited
Shoney Sanil Versus. Coastal Foundation P. ltd. And others
Chloro Controls India (P) Limited versus. Severn Trent Water
ONGC Limited Versus. Discovery Enterprises (P) Limited
M.R. Engineers and Contractors Pvt. Ltd. vs. Som Datt Builders Ltd.
Dissenting non-signatory member of cooperative society not bound by arbitration clause in development agreement with developer; lacks consent as veritable party despite beneficiary status or executin....
The court ruled that non-signatories may be bound by arbitration agreements if their conduct indicates consent, but complex factual questions regarding such consent should be resolved by the Arbitral....
Non-signatories can be bound by arbitration agreements based on their conduct and involvement in the contractual relationship.
Non-signatory cannot be impleaded in arbitration absent conduct showing consent via participation in contract's negotiation, performance or termination; substantial financial interest alone insuffici....
Non-signatory held veritable party to arbitration agreement via active contract performance, composite transaction with supplementary agreement, and conduct, justifying joinder under Section 11; limi....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.