IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
N.J. JAMADAR, J.
Robert Gragery D’Souza - Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra (At the instance of Naigaon Police Station/EOW, Mira-Bhayander, Vasai Virar Police Commissionerate) – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 235 of 2026
Decided On : 11-03-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations of forgery, cheating, breach in trust property sale. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contention: trustee not 'agent' under section 409 ipc. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. magistrate must prima facie verify offences for statutory bail. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. entrustment for s409 arises in any manner whatsoever. (Para 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 5. trustee holds legal ownership, not agency over trust property. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 6. 'agent' in s409 broadly covers entrusted business capacities. (Para 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. trustee's sale task constitutes s409 agency entrustment. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
N.J. JAMADAR, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith, and, with the consent of learned Counsel for the parties, heard finally.
2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (“BNSS, 2023) (Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973), the petitioner assails the legality and correctness of an order dated 09th December, 2025 passed by the learned Magistrate, Vasai whereby an application preferred by the petitioner to enlarge him on default bail under the provisions of Section 167(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (‘the Code, 1973’), came to be rejected.
3. Shorn of superfluities, the background facts can be stated as under:-
3.1 Shejar Chhaya Trust, Devdal (the trust) is a public charitable trust. The Trust was formed in the year, 1984 with the object of providing shelter and education to orphan children. On 28th December, 2019, the petitioner became the Secretary of the Trust.
3.2 Father Francis Peter Gonsalves, the Chief Trustee of the Trust had entrusted the responsibility of obtaining the sanction of the Charity Commissioner for the sale of trust property i.e. 21 Guntha land out of 40 Guntha land, situated at Survey No. 63, Hissa No. A/1.
3.3 The prosecution alleges on 14th December, 2020, the petitioner filed an application before the Charity Commissioner to sale the entire Survey No. 63, A/1 admeasuring 40 Guntha and another Survey No. 16 admeasuring 76.60 Guntha. False statements were made in the said application. On the basis of such false statements and false documents on 24th September, 2023, the petitioner obtained the sanction of the Charity Commissioner for the sale of 116.60 Guntha land of the Trust in favour of the R. K. Developers for a consideration of Rs. 6,21,00,000/- (Rupees Six Crores Twenty One Lakhs). Out of the said amount, on 22nd July 2021, the petitioner obtained an advance consideration of Rs. 1,20,00,000/- (Rupees One Crore Two Lakhs) and instead of depositing the said amount in the account of the Trust maintained with the Federal Bank, Vasai Road Branch, the petitioner opened a new account with Basin Catholic Co- operative Bank by forging the signatures of the chief trustees and other trustees and got credited the said amount in the said account. Subsequently, the petitioner transferred the said amount to the account of petitioner’s D’Souza Education and Charitable Trust and thereby committed offences of cheating and forgery.
3.4 F.I.R was registered on 27th December, 2024, initially for the offences punishable under Sections 471, 468, 465 and 420 of the Penal Code. Subsequently, the offence punishable under Sections 409 came to be added.
3.5 The petitioner was detained on 06th October, 2024 by the Immigration Officers at IGI Airport, New Delhi. The petitioner was produced before the learned Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi on 07th October, 2025 and transit remand was obtained. The petitioner was produced before the learned Magistrate at Vasai on 10th October, 2025, and was remanded to Police custody.
3.6 On 09th December, 2025, the petitioner preferred an application before the learned Magistrate seeking his release under the provisions of Section 167(2) of the Code. It was inter alia asserted that, the petitioner has been arraigned for the offences punishable under
Robert John D’Souza & Ors. Vs. Stephen V. Gomes & Anr
The Superintendent & Rememberancer of Legal Affairs, West Bengal Vs. S K Roy
Trustee of public charitable trust entrusted with property sale and proceeds handling acts as 'agent' under IPC Section 409 for criminal breach of trust, justifying 90-day default bail detention if p....
The court upheld the conviction for criminal breach of trust, establishing that failure to disburse entrusted funds by an agent constitutes dishonest misappropriation under the Penal Code.
The prosecution must prove beyond reasonable doubt that the accused, as an agent, acted dishonestly in misappropriating entrusted funds under s 409 of the Penal Code.
(1) Issuance of process – Mere existence of some grounds which would be material in deciding whether accused should be convicted or acquitted does not generally indicate that case must necessarily fa....
It is well settled that the power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. should be sparingly invoked with circumspection; it should be exercised to see that the process of law is not abused or misused.
The court determined that mere breaches of contract do not constitute criminal offences without proof of fraudulent intent, emphasizing that civil disputes should not be converted into criminal compl....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.