SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 324

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 
VIBHA KANKANWADI, HITEN S.VENEGAVKAR, JJ.
Bhagwan S/o Vitthalrao Wakde - Petitioner 
Versus 
The State of Maharashtra - Respondent
Writ Petition No.5849, 5852, 5859 of 2024, 9090, 9085 of 2025
Decided On : 27-02-2026

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A. G. Ambetkar, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Neha B. Kamble, AG, Mr. Ashok B. Tele, Advocate, Mr. R. P. Bhumkar, Advocate Mr. A. P. Avhad, Advocate Mr. D. R. Adhav, Advocate Mr. P. R. Nangare, Advocate Mr. B. T. Bodkhe, Advocate Mr. M. M. Parghane, Advocate Mr. H. S. Kamble, Advocate Mr. N. R. Pawde, Advocate

Pre-01.11.2005 appointees in non-grant divisions of 100% grant-in-aid schools entitled to old pension scheme, not DCPS/NPS unless opted; Court bound by precedent, mandates immediate benefits and refunds.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 - Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 - General Provident Fund - Defined Contribution Pension Scheme/National Pension Scheme - Employees appointed prior to 01.11.2005 in non-grant-in-aid or partially aided divisions of 100% grant-in-aid schools entitled to old pension scheme benefits and not DCPS/NPS unless specifically opted - Issue res integra conclusively decided by prior consistent judgments binding on Court - Retiral benefits are right upon superannuation, not bounty - Duty cast on respondents to extend benefits without delay post verification limited to calculation - Petitioners declared governed by old scheme; deductions under DCPS refunded within four weeks; GPF accounts allotted within six weeks; pension proposals for retired employees submitted forthwith. (Paras 3, 5, 7, 8, 9)

(B) Service Law - Pension - Employees in unaided divisions of fully aided institutions as on 01.11.2005 treated at par with aided division employees for pension applicability - No specific mention or further liberty for verification needed once entitlement declared by Court. (Paras 6, 7)

Facts of the case:
Multiple writ petitions by assistant teachers/junior college lecturers appointed prior to 01.11.2005 initially in non-grant or partially aided divisions of 100% grant-in-aid schools/colleges, later shifted to full grant divisions, some retired, claiming old pension scheme over DCPS/NPS introduced from 01.11.2005.

Findings of Court:
Writs allowed; petitioners entitled to old pension scheme, commutation rules, GPF; no DCPS deductions henceforth with refunds; GPF accounts to be allotted; managements to submit pension proposals for eligible retired petitioners.

Issues: Whether pre-01.11.2005 appointees in non-grant divisions of 100% aided schools governed by old pension scheme or DCPS/NPS; scope of verification post judicial declaration of entitlement.

Ratio Decidendi: Court bound by precedent holding such employees entitled to old scheme; retiral benefits immediate right; service rules not altered mid-service without law; verification post-declaration confined to computation.

Result: Writ petitions allowed.

Table of Content
1. pre-2005 appointees in non-aided divisions seek old pension. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. precedents favor old pension; respondents seek verification. (Para 5 , 6)
3. pre-01.11.2005 employees entitled to old pension benefits. (Para 7 , 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT :

(Per Smt. Vibha Kankanwadi, J.)

1. Writ Petition No.2850 of 2025 is not in board. Upon mentioning, the said petition is taken on board.

2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard by consent of parties.

3. By the present writ petitions, the petitioners claim that they are employees appointed prior to 31.10.2005 in the partially aided division of 100% aided schools and are seeking declaration that the petitioners are governed under old pension scheme i.e. Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 and Maharashtra Civil Services (Commutation of Pension) Rules, 1984 and General Provident Fund, which are applicable to the Assistant Teacher/Jr. College Teachers who are appointed prior to 01.11.2005 and shall not apply the Defined Contribution Pension Scheme (DCPS) or National Pension Scheme (NPS), which replaces the old pension scheme from 01.11.2005. The petitioners also pray to consequently direct the respondents to take steps to extend benefits under old pension scheme in favour of the petitioners and direct the concerned schools to forthwith submit the pension papers/proposal of the petitioners who are appointed as Assistant Teacher/Junior College Teachers prior to 01.11.2005 and already stood retired within six weeks. The issue involved in these petitions is common and is therefore taken up for consideration.

4. The petitioners have approached this Court seeking multiple reliefs and consequential reliefs arising out of the main reliefs. The facts in detail are noted in tabular form.

Writ Petition Nos.Name of PetitionerDate of First Appointment & (Approval) & PostDate of Full Time (Approval) & Post100% Grant Received in YearSchool/College Name
WP/5849/2024Bhagwan Vitthalrao Wakde Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.02.07.1999 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (Non grant-in- aid divisions of Jr. College)2006-2007 (Full-Time Jr. Lecturer) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of Jr. College) Retired on 31.01.20241995-1996Renuka Secondary & Higher Secondary School Mantha, Tq. Mantha, Dist. Jalna
WP/5859/2024Shaikh Ayesha Parveen Shaikh Allaoddin Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.15.06.2001 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (Non grant-in-aid divisions of school)2014-2015 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of school) (Retired on 30.06.2022)1996Bilal Primary School Hamalwadi, Tq. Parli Vaijnath, Dist. Beed.
WP/9090/2025Minakshi Tryambak Nemade @ Minakshi Vasudeo Hole Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.01.07.1999 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI class of school) (Non grant-in-aid divisions of XII class of school)2007-2008 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI & XII class of school)1945 (School) 1983-1984 (Jr. College)N. H. Ranka High School & Jr. College Bodwad, Tq. Bodwad, Dist. Jalgaon.
WP/9085/2025Mahendra Bhaurao Pandit Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.01.07.1999 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI class of school) (Non grant-in-aid divisions of XII class of school)2007-2008 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI & XII class of school)1945 (School) 1983-1984 (Jr. College)N. H. Ranka High School & Jr. College Bodwad, Tq. Bodwad, Dist. Jalgaon.
WP/9070/2025Anil Tukaram Dandade Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.14.06.2003 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI class of school) (Non grant-in-aid divisions of XII class of school)2007-2008 (Full-Time Assistant Teacher) (100% grant-in-aid divisions of XI & XII class of school)1945 (School) 1983-1984 (Jr. College)N. H. Ranka High School & Jr. College Bodwad, Tq. Bodwad, Dist. Jalgaon.
WP/9087/2025Dnyaneshwar Jagnnath Chikte Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors.01.07.1999 (Full-Time Assi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top