SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 348

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
G.S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe, JJ.
Amit Manilal Haria - Petitioner
Versus
The Joint Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise - Respondent
Writ Petition No. 5001 of 2025
Decided On : 25-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. Abhishek A. Rastogi with Pooja M. Rastogi, Meenal Songire, Aarya More
For the Respondent: Mr. Ram Ochani with Sangeeta Yadav

Section 122(1A) CGST Act imposes penalty only on taxable persons retaining benefits of specified transactions conducted at their instance; inapplicable to mere employees without such findings or taxable status; no retrospective application pre-effective date.

Headnote:(A) CGST Act, 2017 - Sections 2(84), 2(107), 122(1), 122(1A) - Penalty for offences - Provision of sub-section (1A) of Section 122 applicable only to taxable person as defined under Section 2(107) who retains benefit of transaction covered under clauses (i), (ii), (vii) or (ix) of sub-section (1) and at whose instance such transaction conducted - Employees of company, not being taxable persons in individual capacity, cannot be fastened with personal penalty equivalent to tax evaded or input tax credit availed or passed on - No vicarious liability under CGST Act - Retrospective application of Section 122(1A), effective from 1 January 2021, to earlier period violative of Article 20(1) of Constitution. (Paras 18-30)

(B) Writ Petition under Article 226 - Challenge to show cause notices and order-in-original imposing penalties on employees for alleged fake invoicing and ineligible input tax credit - Absence of jurisdictional facts renders proceedings without authority of law - Binding precedent requiring taxable person status and retention of benefit not followed. (Paras 25-28)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners, holding positions of chief financial officer, chief executive officer, director and joint managing director as employees of company, challenged show cause notices and order-in-original confirming penalties each equivalent to alleged ineligible input tax credit availed and passed on by company through fake invoices without actual supply, for period July 2017 to March 2022. Penalties imposed under Section 122(1A) despite company depositing amounts under protest and denying allegations.

Findings of Court:
Show cause notices and impugned order against petitioners illegal and without jurisdiction as they are not taxable persons and no material showing retention of benefits or transactions at their instance; retrospective penalty for pre-2021 period invalid.

Issues: Whether Section 122(1A) applicable to non-taxable employees for company's alleged fake input tax credit transactions; validity of retrospective penalty imposition; proportionality of penalties.

Ratio Decidendi: Sub-section (1A) of Section 122 read with sub-section (1) applies exclusively to taxable persons satisfying dual requirements of retaining transaction benefits and conducting at their instance; employees lack such capacity absent personal registration; no jurisdiction without these ingredients; order quashed following precedent on similar facts. Result : Writ petition allowed; impugned order quashed to extent against petitioners.

Table of Content
1. gst probe, arrests, scns, penalties on company officers. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
2. debate on section 122(1a) jurisdiction over employees. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
3. section 122(1a) applies only to taxable persons. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24)
4. shantanu precedent bars employee penalties under 122(1a). (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
5. no retrospective penalty; distinguishes contrary cases. (Para 29 , 30 , 31)
6. order quashed for lack of jurisdiction. (Para 32 , 33)

JUDGMENT :

G. S. Kulkarni, J.

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges an order-in-original dated 1 February 2025 whereby the show cause notice dated 2 August 2024 issued to the petitioners by the Joint Commissioner (AE), CGST & C.Ex. Mumbai East, in the proceedings of one ‘M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited’, has been confirmed not only against the said entity but also against the petitioners who are the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Executive Officer and Director and Joint Managing Director respectively, being the employees of the said entity, to the extent that the petitioners have been ordered with a penalty of Rs.1,33,60,60,889/- each. The operative portion of the impugned order passed against the petitioners is required to be noted which reads thus:

“(F). In respect of Shri, Atul Hirji Mara, Joint Managing Director; Shri, Hiren Gada, Chief Executive Officer, and Shri, Amit Haria, Chief Financial Officer of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Limited

(i) I impose penalty amounting to Rs. 1,33,60,60,889/- (Rupees One hundred thirty three crores sixty lakh sixty thousand eight hundred and eighty nine only) (inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed amounting to Rs. 70,25,61,996/-(CGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/- & SGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/-) and ineligible ITC passed on amounting to Rs. 63,34,98,893/- (CGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/- & SGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/-)) on Shri, Atul Hirji Maru, Joint Managing Director of M/s Shemaroo Entertainment Limited of an amount equivalent to the fake input- tax credit availed of or passed on, under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017 and MGST Act, 2017;

(ii) I impose penalty amounting to Rs. 1,33,60,60,889/- (Rupees One hundred thirty three crores sixty lakh sixty thousand eight hundred and eighty nine only) (inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed amounting to Rs. 70,25,61,996/-(CGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/- & SGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/-) and ineligible ITC passed on amounting to Rs. 63,34,98,893/- (CGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/- & SGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/-)) on Shri, Hiren Gada, Chief Executive Officer of M/s Shemaroo Entertainment Limited of an amount equivalent to the fake input tax credit availed of or passed on, under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017 and MGST Act, 2017;

(iii) I impose penalty amounting to Rs. 1,33,60,60,889/- (Rupees One hundred thirty three cGaramond Classicorores sixty lakh sixty thousand eight hundred and eighty nine only) (inadmissible Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed amounting to Rs. 70,25,61,996/-(CGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/- & SGST of Rs. 35,12,80,998/-) and ineligible ITC passed on amounting to Rs. 63,34,98,893/- (CGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/- & SGST of Rs. 31,67,49,446/-)) on Shri, Amit Haria, Chief Financial Officer of M/s Shemaroo Entertainment Limited of an amount equivalent to the fake input tax credit availed of or passed on, under Section 122(1A) of the CGST Act, 2017 and MGST Act, 2017.”

2. The facts in brief are required to be noted.

The petitioners are individuals and are the employees/officers of M/s. Shemaroo Entertainment Ltd. (for short ‘the company’) duly incorporated under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956, having its principal place of business at Marol Naka, Andheri (East), Mumbai. The genesis of the dispute appears to be a search action, which was initiated on 5 September 2023 in terms of authorization issued under Section 67(2) of the Central Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’) in res

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top