SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(All) 2830

PANKAJ BHATIA
Clear Secured Services Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Commissioner, State Tax GST, U. P. Commercial Tax, Lucknow – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
For the Petitioner: Jameel Ahmad.
For the Respondent: C.S.C.

JUDGMENT

Pankaj Bhatia, J.

Since both the petitions raise a common issue, they are being decided by this common order.

2. Heard Shri Raghvendra Sworup Sharma and Shri Jameel Ahmad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anurag Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent department.

3. For the sake of brevity, the facts of Writ Tax No.5 of 2023 is being taken up.

4. Present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 25.08.2021 whereby the order of penalty was passed imposing a penalty of Rs.28,00,476/- towards CGST and Rs.28,00,476/- towards SGST in purported exercise of powers under Section 122 of GST Act.

The petitioner also challenges the order dated 14.09.2022 whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. The said two orders are contained in Annexure - P1 & P2.

5. The facts, in brief, are that the petitioner is a private company limited and is providing manpower supply services. The petitioner was served with a show-cause notice dated 27.05.2021 contained in Annexure - P1, whereby allegations were levelled against the petitioner alleging that although the petitioner had collected the GST but the same was not paid within the time pres

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top