Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
NEELA GOKHALE
Gerald Michael Misquitta – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra through its Chief Secretary and represented by Office of Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ challenges deemed conveyance certificate and transfer deed. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. owners mandatory parties entitled to hearing. (Para 5) |
| 3. leasehold conveyance causes no owner prejudice. (Para 6) |
| 4. order void ab initio for natural justice violation. (Para 7) |
| 5. mofa requires promoter hearing before conveyance certificate. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. authority's inquiry excludes title; civil court for disputes. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. selective joinder and unverified documents taint proceedings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. audi alteram partem breach vitiates order. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. actions prejudice co-owners' reversionary rights. (Para 28 , 29) |
| 10. order quashed; remitted for fresh hearing. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
JUDGMENT :
NEELA GOKHALE, J.
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With consent of the parties, the Petition is taken up for final hearing.
2. The Petitioner assails Order dated 28th May 2014 passed by the Respondent No. 2 - District Deputy Registrar of Co- operative Societies (3), Mumbai, ('Competent Authority') whereby the Deputy Registrar issued a Certificate, certifying the case of the Respondent No. 3 - Societ
Co-owners must be made parties and given hearing before Competent Authority grants unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA Section 11; natural justice mandatory, no prejudice needed to prove where pr....
The Competent Authority's failure to ensure service of notice and adherence to natural justice principles invalidates the ex parte decision regarding Unilateral Deemed Conveyance.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the limited scope of the Competent Authority's enquiry under section 11 of the Maharashtra Ownership of Flats Act, 1963, and the dismissal of the P....
The court established that in applications for unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA, all parties with a legitimate interest, including landowners, must be given notice and an opportunity to be hea....
The Competent Authority under MOFA cannot adjudicate title disputes; it must fulfill statutory obligations to issue deemed conveyance to the Society.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the nature of power exercised by the Competent Authority under Section 11 of the MOFA Act, emphasizing the obligation of the promoter to convey rig....
The court affirmed that a unilateral deemed conveyance can be granted under MOFA despite ongoing litigation, as the statutory rights of flat purchasers are not extinguished by an auction sale.
Promoter under MOFA s.11 must convey full right, title, interest in proportionate land/building to society of completed segment despite incomplete layout; procedural defects invalid only on prejudice....
The court established that the promoter's obligation under MOFA to convey property to the society is paramount, and the competent authority's role is limited to ensuring compliance with this obligati....
The competent authority under MOFA must properly examine the legality and validity of the deed of conveyance and consider the applicant's eligibility and the promoter's compliance with the obligation....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
