Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
AMIT BORKAR
Nusli Neville Wadia – Appellant
Versus
Ijimima – Imitation Jewellery Market Co-operative Society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of deemed conveyance dispute under mofa. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. improper notice service violates natural justice principles. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. contracts stipulate leasehold rights overriding freehold conveyance. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. deemed conveyance conforms strictly to section 4 agreements. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 5. mofa mandates promoter's full title transfer to society. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44) |
| 6. mofa compels promoter to convey entire right, title, interest. (Para 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61) |
| 7. mofa agreements supersede prior private lease contracts. (Para 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75) |
| 8. authority enforces promoter's existing title without enlargement. (Para 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82) |
| 9. conveyance not postponed pending full layout completion. (Para 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87) |
| 10. no vitiation absent real prejudice from procedural lapses. (Para 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 10 |
Promoter under MOFA s.11 must convey full right, title, interest in proportionate land/building to society of completed segment despite incomplete layout; procedural defects invalid only on prejudice....
Deemed conveyance under MOFA must adhere to statutory obligations, and timelines cannot be circumvented by private agreements; competent authority must assess the proportional area for conveyance acc....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the conveyance of land must be in accordance with the agreement between the parties, and a technical violation of natural justice may not warr....
The competent authority's jurisdiction to grant deemed conveyance is limited and cannot delve into aspects of title. An order granting deemed conveyance does not conclude the issue of right, title, a....
The Competent Authority under MOFA cannot adjudicate title disputes; it must fulfill statutory obligations to issue deemed conveyance to the Society.
The court affirmed that deemed conveyance under MOFA can apply to composite societies, despite differing member agreements, emphasizing equitable treatment and the necessity of proper procedural comp....
The Competent Authority's jurisdiction under Section 11 of the MOFA Act is limited to enforcing the promoter's obligations, not adjudicating title disputes, which must be resolved in civil courts.
Disputes over excess area or title in deemed conveyance orders under MOFA Section 11(3) are for civil courts, not writ jurisdiction; promoters cannot retain land via private clauses against statutory....
The competent authority under MOFA must properly examine the legality and validity of the deed of conveyance and consider the applicant's eligibility and the promoter's compliance with the obligation....
Co-owners must be made parties and given hearing before Competent Authority grants unilateral deemed conveyance under MOFA Section 11; natural justice mandatory, no prejudice needed to prove where pr....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
