IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S. Karnik, S.M. Modak, JJ.
Shri Ashok Motiram Jadhav - Petitioner
Versus
The Director Medical Education And Research Dental College and Hospital - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 13310 of 2016
Decided On : 09-02-2026
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's service and initial tbp pay history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. claim to pb9300-34800 gp4300 under 6th cpc. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. pay correctly fixed per grs isolated post. (Para 7 , 8 , 14) |
| 4. tribunal denies higher pay lacking qualifications. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. tbp financial upgradation needs no promo quals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. gr2001 schedule-ii for tbp pay scales. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 7. second tbp after 24 years service. (Para 18 , 19) |
| 8. order arrears payment within four months. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT :
M. S. KARNIK, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondent-State.
2. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 27.03.2015 passed in Original Application No. 253 of 2012 (for short ‘O.A.’), passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (For short ‘Tribunal’). The O.A. was filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal challenging the communication dated 17.02.2012, issued by the respondent No. 2 rejecting the demand of the petitioner for grade-pay scale of Rs. 4,200/- in the Pay Band of Rs. 9300-34800 in respect of Time Bound Promotion.
3. The brief facts are that petitioner was appointed as Dental Technician on 08.09.1981, in pay scale of Rs. 365-760 which was revised to Rs. 1400-2300 with effect from 01.01.1986 (as per 4th pay commission). The petitioner was granted Time Bound Promotion (for short ‘TBP’) on completion of 12 years of continuous service on 01.10.1994 in terms of G.R. dated 08.06.1995. The petitioner’s pay was fixed in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 after implementation of 5th Pay Commission i.e. with effect from 01.01.1996. The petitioner’s pay was fixed in the Pay Band Rs.5200-20, 200 with effect from 01.01.2006 after implementation of 6th Pay Commission. The petitioner is seeking fixation of pay in the Pay Band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4300/-.
4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he has been getting pay in the payband of Rs. 1400-2300 with effect from 01.01.1986. The petitioner was granted TBP with effect from 01.10.1994. As per the Government Resolution dated 03.08.2001, for isolated posts, separate pay scales on TBP were granted. In terms of Schedule I of the G.R., for the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300, the pay scale on TBP was Rs. 1640-2900. In terms of G.R. dated 03.08.2001, the pay scale as per the 5th Pay Commission corresponding to pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 is Rs.5500-9000. However, according to the learned counsel, the petitioner was entitled to pay scale of Rs.6500-10,500 as per G.R. dated 27.03.1997.
5. The learned counsel submitted that petitioner is entitled to get pay in the Pay Band of Rs. 9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs. 4300/- with effect from 01.01.2006, as the Hakim Committee has recommended grant of this Pay Band in 6th Pay Commission to those who were in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 in the 5th Pay Commission.
6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal was not justified in holding that as petitioner does not possess the qualification for the promotional post, the petitioner is not entitled for benefit of higher pay scale. It is further submitted that benefit of the second TBP is not given to him though the petitioner is entitled for the same. The said aspect has not been considered by the Tribunal according to learned counsel.
7. Learned AGP on the other hand supported the order passed by the Tribunal. It is submitted that after the TBP was granted with effect from 01.10.1994, the petitioner’s pay was fixed in the scale of 1600- 2500 in revised pay of Rs. 5500-9000 as per Schedule-I of G.R. dated 03.08.2001. It is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to get higher pay scale as per Schedule-2 of the aforesaid Government Resolution as he was granted the TBP before the 01.01.1996.
8. Learned AGP submitted that the pay scale of Dental Technician in 5th Pay Commission was Rs.4500-7000. As per 6th Pay Commission he was entitled to revised pay scale of Rs.5200-20200
Time Bound Promotion on isolated posts grants financial upgradation after 12 and 24 years without needing educational qualifications for higher posts, as it is non-functional in-situ promotion to rel....
The arbitrary introduction of a cut-off date affecting an employee's entitlement to a promotional pay scale was held to be violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.
The court upheld that only qualified employees are entitled to the promotion pay scale, rejecting claims for higher grades based on equal pay principles due to lack of required qualifications.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of higher pay scale for Child Development Project Officers based on the 1983 Recruitment Rules and the 16.08.1984 Government Resolu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of employees to a higher pay scale as per the Government Resolution dated 16.08.1994 and the recruitment rules, based on their resp....
Authorities have discretion to correct financial discrepancies in pay, yet wrongful promotions may negate claims for additional benefits like A.C.P. confirmations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is the entitlement of the higher pay scale of Rs.2000-3500 for the petitioners based on completion of 9 years of service and the promotional post of C....
Article 229 of the Constitution of India and the employees and staff members of the District Courts are governed by different rules. In the wake of above, they are entitled to higher grade pay-scale.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.