SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(Bom) 507

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
M.S. Karnik, S.M. Modak, JJ.
Shri Ashok Motiram Jadhav - Petitioner
Versus
The Director Medical Education And Research Dental College and Hospital - Respondent
Civil Writ Petition No. 13310 of 2016
Decided On : 09-02-2026

Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Indrayani M. Koparkar a/w Ms. Ankita Naik – Advocate
For the Respondent: Shri N. C. Walimbe – Addl. GP a/w Shri S. P. Kamble – AGP

Time Bound Promotion on isolated posts grants financial upgradation after 12 and 24 years without needing educational qualifications for higher posts, as it is non-functional in-situ promotion to relieve stagnation.

Headnote:(A) Time Bound Promotion Scheme - Introduced to provide financial upgradation and relieve stagnation for employees on isolated posts without promotional avenues; fulfilment of educational qualifications prescribed for actual promotion not required, as it is non-functional in-situ promotion granting mere monetary benefits without actual promotion to higher post. (Paras 11, 12, 13)

(B) Pay Fixation under Successive Pay Commissions - Employee granted first TBP after 12 years service placed in pay scale revised to Rs.5500-9000 (5th Pay Commission); entitled to second TBP after 24 years in Rs.6500-10500 as per relevant Government Resolution schedules, irrespective of pre-01.01.1996 grant of first TBP. (Paras 14, 17, 18, 19)

Facts of the case:
Petitioner appointed as Dental Technician (isolated post) on 08.09.1981, granted first TBP on 01.10.1994 after 12 years, pay fixed at Rs.5500-9000 post 5th Pay Commission and Rs.5200-20200 with grade pay 2800 post 6th Pay Commission. Tribunal rejected claim for higher pay band Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay 4300 citing lack of qualifications for promotional post and single TBP applicability.

Findings of Court:
Petitioner's pay to be fixed in Rs.6500-200-10500 w.e.f. 01.10.2006 on second TBP with arrears and consequential benefits paid within four months.

Issues: Whether educational qualifications required for TBP benefits on isolated post; entitlement to second TBP after 24 years despite Tribunal's view on single TBP and qualifications.

Ratio Decidendi: TBP/ACP schemes aim at anti-stagnation relief via financial upgradation without promotion; educational qualifications unnecessary for in-situ benefits on isolated posts, as confirmed by Supreme Court; petitioner entitled to two TBPs leading to higher pay scale under specified resolutions.

Result: Writ petition partly allowed; Tribunal order quashed and set aside.

Table of Content
1. petitioner's service and initial tbp pay history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. claim to pb9300-34800 gp4300 under 6th cpc. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. pay correctly fixed per grs isolated post. (Para 7 , 8 , 14)
4. tribunal denies higher pay lacking qualifications. (Para 9 , 10)
5. tbp financial upgradation needs no promo quals. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)
6. gr2001 schedule-ii for tbp pay scales. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. second tbp after 24 years service. (Para 18 , 19)
8. order arrears payment within four months. (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)

JUDGMENT :

M. S. KARNIK, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AGP for the respondent-State.

2. The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 27.03.2015 passed in Original Application No. 253 of 2012 (for short ‘O.A.’), passed by the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (For short ‘Tribunal’). The O.A. was filed by the petitioner before the Tribunal challenging the communication dated 17.02.2012, issued by the respondent No. 2 rejecting the demand of the petitioner for grade-pay scale of Rs. 4,200/- in the Pay Band of Rs. 9300-34800 in respect of Time Bound Promotion.

3. The brief facts are that petitioner was appointed as Dental Technician on 08.09.1981, in pay scale of Rs. 365-760 which was revised to Rs. 1400-2300 with effect from 01.01.1986 (as per 4th pay commission). The petitioner was granted Time Bound Promotion (for short ‘TBP’) on completion of 12 years of continuous service on 01.10.1994 in terms of G.R. dated 08.06.1995. The petitioner’s pay was fixed in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 after implementation of 5th Pay Commission i.e. with effect from 01.01.1996. The petitioner’s pay was fixed in the Pay Band Rs.5200-20, 200 with effect from 01.01.2006 after implementation of 6th Pay Commission. The petitioner is seeking fixation of pay in the Pay Band of Rs.9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs.4300/-.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that he has been getting pay in the payband of Rs. 1400-2300 with effect from 01.01.1986. The petitioner was granted TBP with effect from 01.10.1994. As per the Government Resolution dated 03.08.2001, for isolated posts, separate pay scales on TBP were granted. In terms of Schedule I of the G.R., for the pay scale of Rs. 1400-2300, the pay scale on TBP was Rs. 1640-2900. In terms of G.R. dated 03.08.2001, the pay scale as per the 5th Pay Commission corresponding to pay scale of Rs.1640-2900 is Rs.5500-9000. However, according to the learned counsel, the petitioner was entitled to pay scale of Rs.6500-10,500 as per G.R. dated 27.03.1997.

5. The learned counsel submitted that petitioner is entitled to get pay in the Pay Band of Rs. 9300-34800 with grade pay of Rs. 4300/- with effect from 01.01.2006, as the Hakim Committee has recommended grant of this Pay Band in 6th Pay Commission to those who were in the pay scale of Rs. 5500-9000 in the 5th Pay Commission.

6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the Tribunal was not justified in holding that as petitioner does not possess the qualification for the promotional post, the petitioner is not entitled for benefit of higher pay scale. It is further submitted that benefit of the second TBP is not given to him though the petitioner is entitled for the same. The said aspect has not been considered by the Tribunal according to learned counsel.

7. Learned AGP on the other hand supported the order passed by the Tribunal. It is submitted that after the TBP was granted with effect from 01.10.1994, the petitioner’s pay was fixed in the scale of 1600- 2500 in revised pay of Rs. 5500-9000 as per Schedule-I of G.R. dated 03.08.2001. It is submitted that the petitioner is not entitled to get higher pay scale as per Schedule-2 of the aforesaid Government Resolution as he was granted the TBP before the 01.01.1996.

8. Learned AGP submitted that the pay scale of Dental Technician in 5th Pay Commission was Rs.4500-7000. As per 6th Pay Commission he was entitled to revised pay scale of Rs.5200-20200

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top