Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
DEEPAK ROSHAN
Bhola Prasad Singh S/o Late Deo Nandan Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner requests for confirmation of acp benefits and pension finalization. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. petitioner's argument concerning entitlement to acp benefits despite prior promotions. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. court identifies two key issues regarding cancellation of acp and pay scale correction. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. court's analysis of acp cancellation justified; petitioner entitled to higher pay scale. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. court orders pay fixation in higher scale and restrains recovery of excess salary. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
JUDGMENT :
DEEPAK ROSHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. In the instant writ application the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs:
(i) For issuance of an appropriate writ(s), order(s) or direction(s) of or in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents concerned to immediately and forthwith give confirmation of the 2nd ACP granted to the petitioner vide Office Order No. 422 dated 26.2.2008 with effect from 15.9.2005 in the pay scale of Rs. 8000 -13500, since the pension papers of the petitioner was returned by the Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi (Respondent No. 5) pointing that confirmation order of 2nd ACP granted t
Authorities have discretion to correct financial discrepancies in pay, yet wrongful promotions may negate claims for additional benefits like A.C.P. confirmations.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that entitlement to selection grade and special grade is subject to completion of requisite years of service, and recovery orders issued within one....
Retired employees entitled to second ACP in Rs.8000-13500 w.e.f. date of SSS cadre restructuring (12.02.2002) upon completing 24 years service, as non-functional scales ignored and benefits granted i....
Erroneous ACP financial up-gradation can be withdrawn upon pay scale revision confirming substantive promotion from LDC to Junior Accountant.
The downgraded pay scale of the Inspector under ROP (2nd Amendment) 2006 was not applicable to the petitioner, and the objection raised by the respondent No. 6 to the claims made by the petitioner fo....
Industry Extension Officers, as feeder cadre to Project Manager under Cadre Rules, entitled to 1st ACP in Rs.6500-10500 scale; order reducing to Rs.5500-9000 relying on deleted Finance Resolution cla....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
