R.M.SAHAI, K.RAMASWAMY
Ajay Agarwal – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
K. Ramaswamy, J. – Special leave granted. 2. The appellant, accused No.2 in P. Ch. (CBI) No. 40/2, dated February 18, 1985, F.I.R. No. RC No. 2 to 4/1983 dated March 4, 1983 and P.S. SPE/CBI/CTU (E) I/New Delhi, Dist. Delhi and four other namely, V.P. Anand, Baldev Raj Sharma, Bansi Lal and Rimjit Kumar Marwah are accused in the said case. It is the prosecution case that the accused hatched a conspiracy at Chandigarh to cheat Punjab National Bank for short 'PNB'. In furtherance there of V.P. Anand floated three New Link Enterprises and Mis. Moonlight Industries in the name of Baldev Raj Sharma, his employee and Mis. Guru Nanak Industries in the name of Bansi Lal, yet another employee. He opened current accounts in their respective names in the P.N.B. at Chandigarh. In furtherance of the conspiracy and in confabulation with V.P. Anand, the appellant, Ajay Aggarwal a non-resident Indian at Dubai who is running Mis. Sales International, Dubai, agreed to and got credit facility by way of Foreign Letters of Credit Nos. 4069-p, 4070-p and 4084-p, issued proforma invoices of the said concern and addresses to PNB through Guru Nanak Industries and New Link Enterprises. Ranjit Marwa
K. Satwant Singh v. State of Punjab 1960(2) S.C.R 89.
Noor Mohammad Yusuf Momin v. State of Maharashtra; (1971)1 S.C.R. 119.
R.K. Dalmia & Anr. v. Delhi Admn.; (1963)1 S.C.R 253.
Shivanarayan Laxminarayan & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra (1980)2 S.C.C. 465.
Lennart Schussler & Anr. v. Director of Enforcement & Anr; (1970) 2 S.C.R. 760.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.