SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

PIYUSH MATHUR
Babla alias Ramvir – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Shri Atul Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent/State:Shri B.D. Mahore, Dy. Government Advocate.

JUDGEMENT

Piyush Mathur, J.—The Appellants have preferred this Criminal Appeal on being aggrieved by the Judgment of Conviction passed by 3rd Additional Sessions Judge (Fast Track) Gwalior in S.T. No. 325/2000, whereby the Appellants have been convicted for an offence punishable under Section 147 IPC for undergoing an imprisonment of One Year with fine of Rs. 200/- and under Section 148 IPC for undergoing an imprisonment of Two Years with fine of Rs. 300/- and under Section 326/149 IPC for undergoing an imprisonment of Five Years with Fine of Rs. 500/- for causing injuries to Injured/Complainant Ram Babu and have been further convicted under Section

323/149 IPC for undergoing an imprisonment of One Month with fine of Rs. 200/- for causing injuries to Shree Bai.

2. The prosecution has disclosed through its evidence that on date 25.07.2000 the Accused-Appellants had gathered together at about 11.00 p.m. at Village Nanakhedi and had formed an unlawful assembly with common object/intention of causing injuries to the Complainant Ram Babu, upon having deadly weapon in their hands. The Investigating Agency had submitted a Charge-Sheet against the Appellants and the Trial Court had framed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top