K.S.P.RADHAKRISHNAN, DALVEER BHANDARI
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Dalveer Bhandari, J. — Leave granted.
2. This appeal involves issues of great public importance pertaining to the importance of individual’s personal liberty and the society’s interest.
3. The society has a vital interest in grant or refusal of bail because every criminal offence is the offence against the State. The order granting or refusing bail must reflect perfect balance between the conflicting interests, namely, sanctity of individual liberty and the interest of the society. The law of bails dovetails two conflicting interests namely, on the one hand, the requirements of shielding the society from the hazards of those committing crimes and potentiality of repeating the same crime while on bail and on the other hand absolute adherence of the fundamental principle of criminal jurisprudence regarding presumption of innocence of an accused until he is found guilty and the sanctity of individual liberty.
4. Brief facts which are necessary to dispose of this appeal are recapitulated as under:
The appellant, who belongs to the Indian National Congress party (for short ‘Congress party’) is the alleged accused in this case. The case of the prosecution, as disclosed in the Fi
Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. State of Punjab (1980) 2 SCC 565
Pokar Ram v. State of Rajasthan and Others
Salauddin Abdulsamad Shaikh v. State of Maharashtra (1996) 1 SCC 667
K. L.Verma v. State and Another (1998) 9 SCC 348
Adri Dharan Das v. State of West Bengal
Sunita Devi v. State of Bihar and Anr.
N. Meera Rani v. Government of Tamil Nadu and Anr.
Vijayalaxmi Cashew Company and Others v. Dy.Commercial Tax Officer and Another (1996) 1 SCC 468
Union of India and Others v. K. S. Subramanian (1976) 3 SCC 677
State of U.P. v.Ram Chandra Trivedi (1976) 4 SCC 52
Palanikumar and Another v. State 2007 (4) CTC 1
A. K.Gopalan v. The State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 27
Kharak Singh v. State of U.P. and Others AIR 1963 SC 1295
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India and Another (1978) 1 SCC 248
State of A.P. v.Challa Ramakrishna Reddy and Ors.
Kartar Singh v. State of Punjab and Ors.
Francis Coralie Mullin v. Administrator, Union Territory of Delhi and Others (1981) 1 SCC 608]
P.Rathinam/Nagbhusan Patnaik v. Union of India and Anr.
Khedat Mazdoor Chetana Sangath v. State of M.P.and Others (1994) 6 SCC 260
Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Ltd. and Another v. Brojo Nath Ganguly and Another
Prem Shankar Shukla v. Delhi Administration (1980) 3 SCC 526
Joginder Kumar v. State of U.P. and Others, 1994(2) Crimes 106: (1994) 4 SCC 260
Union of India v. Raghubir Singh
Thota Sesharathamma and another v. ThotaManikyamma (Dead) by LRs. and others
Mst. Karmi v. Amru (1972) 4 SCC 86
R. Thiruvirkolam v. Presiding Officer and Another
Gujarat Steel Tubes Ltd. v.Mazdoor Sabha (1980) 2 SCC 593.(Para 144)
P.H.Kalyani v. Air France (1964) 2 SCR 104
Bharat Petroleum Cor. Ltd. v. Mumbai Shramik Sangra &Ors.
Central Board of Dawoodi Bohra Community v. State of Maharashtra (2005) 2 SCC 673
Official Liquidator v. Dayanand and Others, 2008(7) Supreme 671: (2008) 10 SCC 1
State of Karnataka and Others v. Umadevi (3) and Others, 2006(3) Supreme 415: (2006) 4 SCC 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.