SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNITA GUPTA
Momin Iqbal – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Ms. Richa Kapoor and Mr. Anil Soni, Advocates
For the Respondent/State: Mr. M.N. Dudeja, APP with ASI Jai Prakash PS S.P. Badli

JUDGMENT

Sunita Gupta, J.—Appellant Momin Iqbal impugns the judgment dated 19th September, 2012 and order on sentence dated 20th September, 2012 vide which he was convicted under Section 498A/304B IPC and was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 years under Section 498A IPC and fine to the tune of Rs.3 lacs in default to undergo SI for 9 months and for offence under Section 304B IPC he was sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for 7 years. The fine of Rs.3 lacs was awarded as compensation to the complainant. Both the substantive sentences were to run concurrently. Benefit of Section 428 Cr.P.C. was given to the convict.

2. The prosecution case succinctly stated is as follows:-

Shabnam (deceased) got married to the appellant Momin Iqbal on 14th February, 2001. Out of the said wedlock, two children were born. After the marriage, Shabnam started living in her matrimonial home in Sector 18, Rohini, Delhi along with her husband, father-in-law Mohd. Iqbal and mother-in-law Akbari.

Sajida and Rashid Ali were the sister and husband of sister of Momin Iqbal who used to reside in a house situated at a distance of about 200 yards from the matrimonial home of Shabnam. It is the c

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top