SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SANJAY KAROL, P.S.RANA
State of Himachal Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Anil Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. B.S.Parmar Addl. Advocate General with Mr.J.S.Guleria, Asstt. Advocate General
For the Respondent:Mr.S.M.Goel Advocate

JUDGMENT

P.S.Rana, J.—Present appeal is filed against the judgment passed by the learned Special Judge-I Sirmour District at Nahan in Sessions Trial No. 3-ST/7 of 2012.

BRIEF FACTS OF THE PROSECUTION CASE:

2. Brief facts of the case as alleged by prosecution are that on dated 8.11.2011 at 3.30 PM at bifurcation Ronhat-Bela Baswa road accused was found in exclusive and conscious possession of 650 grams charas. It is alleged by prosecution that on dated 8.11.2011 PW7 ASI Partap Singh along with PW1 HC Bishan Singh, PW2 HHC Rajinder Singh and PW3 Kaku Chauhan left Police Station Shillai in official vehicle No HP-18A-0233 which was driven by PW4 Constable Heera Singh towards Rohnat side in connection with traffic checking and detection of cases. It is alleged by prosecution that at about 3.30 PM when the aforesaid police party was present at place Bella bifurcation accused came from Rohnat side carrying a bag in his hand and on seeing the police officials accused threw his bag down from the road and tried to run away from the spot. It is alleged by prosecution that thereafter accus

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top