SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.T.SANKARAN, K.P.JYOTHINDRANATH
S. Reshmi – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Sri.O.V.Maniprasad and Sri.Jose Antony, Advocates
For the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sri.Suvin R.Menon, CGC
For the Respondent No.3:Advocate, Sri.John Varghese, SC, Cen.Board of Excise
For the Respondent No.4:Advocate, Addl.Director General of Prosecution
For the Respondent No.4: By Government Pleader

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top