SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

V.L.ACHLIYA
Datta – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. A. P. Bhandari, Advocate
For the Respondent: Ms. Priti Diggikar, APP.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

V.L. Achliya, J.—Being aggrieved by judgment and order dt. 08.07.2006 passed in Sessions Case No. 22/2000 by ld. Ad hoc Addl. Sessions Judge, Parbhani, the appellants have preferred this Appeal. The appellant Nos. 1 and 2 along with appellant No. 3 were tried for offence u/s 498A, 306 r/w Section 34 of the IPC. On conclusion of trial, they were acquitted for offence u/s 306 r/w Section 34 of the IPC. However, they were convicted for offence u/s 498A r/w Section 34 of the IPC. The appellant No. 1 sentenced to undergo RI for three years and to pay fine of Rs. 1,000/and in default, to undergo RI for three months. The appellant No. 2 sentenced to suffer RI for two years and pay fine of Rs. 500/and in default, to undergo SI for one month. The appellant No. 3 also convicted u/s 498A of the IPC. During the pendency of appeal, the appellant No. 3 died on 31.08.2009 and hence, the appeal stands abated to the extent of appellant No. 3. For the sake of convenience, the appellants are described as they were referred in the impugned judgment.

2. Briefly stated the facts of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top