SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
Anu Malhotra, J.
Aseem Kapoor and Ors. —Petitioners
versus
State of NCT of Delhi —Respondent
Crl.M.C. Nos.2208, 2209 and 3480 of 2015
Decided on 18.5.2018

Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner in Crl.M.C. No.2208 of 2015:Mr. Manoj Kr. Ohri, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Indresh Kr., Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar and Mr. Pramod Kr. Dubey, Advocates
For the Petitioner in Crl.M.C. No.2209 of 2015:Mr. Sidharth Luthra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Vaibhav Gaggar, Mr. Gautam Khazanchi, Ms. Sumedha Dang, Advocates
For the Petitioner in Crl.M.C. No.3480 of 2015:Mr. Ajay Burman, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Harsit Khurana, Ms. Tanya Harnal and Mr. Sahil Verma, Advocates
For the Respondent in Crl.M.C. Nos.2208, 2209 and 3480 of 2015:Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State with SI Harbir Singh and P.S. R.K. Puram, Advocates
For the Respondent in Crl.M.C. Nos.2208, 2209 and 3480 of 2015:Mr. Ankur Chawla, Mr. Sangram Singh and Ms. Srishti Juneja, Advocates for the sister of the injured

IMPORTANT POINT
Bonafide criminal prosecution cannot be stifled at threshold.

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860—Sections 336/338/308 read with Section 32—Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003—Section 4—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 482—Commission of mischief—Summoning of accused to face trial—Illegal omission on part of hotel management—Instant case relates to fall of a guest’ in Hyatt Regency Hotel—It was sought to be contended on behalf of State that in instant case several laxities and gross negligence of hotel authorities in its duty to take care and preventive measures for safety of its guests made petitioners responsible for running hotel, wholly culpable for criminal negligence—Contention raised on behalf of petitioners that they could not have been summoned for any vicarious liability attributed to them cannot be accepted—Taking totality of averments in charge-sheet into account, investigation conducted pursuant to proceeding of trial court whereby further permission was granted for investigation, factum of injured being still in a state unfit to talk and walk and whose statement is yet to be recorded and investigation in relation to that aspect atleast being pending, coupled with averments in charge-sheet against petitioners in relation to their alleged gross culpabilities in taking due care of guests, it is not appropriate to stifle investigation in power conferred under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. (Paras 59, 137, 140, 141 and 142)

       Result: Petitions dismissed.

       

JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J.—Vide this common judgment all the three petitions are taken up for consideration in as much as they all impugn the summoning order dated 16.5.2015 of the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Patiala House Court, New Delhi in FIR No.390/13, Police Station R.K.Puram, whereby the petitioners, namely,

(i) Aseem Kapoor in Crl.M.C. No.2208/2015;

(ii) Shiv Kumar Jatia in Crl.M.C. No.2209/2015 and;

(iii) Karan Lal in Crl.M.C. No.3480/2015,

have been summoned for the alleged commission of the offences punishable under Sections 336/338 read with Section 32 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act—2003, hereinafter referred to as COTPA 2003, and proceedings therein. The three petitions also seek the quashing of the charge-sheet dated 16.3.2015 filed in relation to the alleged commission of offences with the FIR No.390/13, Police Station R.K.Puram, having initially been registered on 19.10.2013 for the alleged commission of offences punishable under Section 308 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. The FIR registered on 19.10.2013 relates to an incident of the date 16.10.2013 which is stated to have taken place at 11:45 p.m. in the Hyatt Regency Hotel, Bhikaji Cama Place, whereby the visitor/guest of the said hotel, namely, Gaurav Rishi S/o Sushma Rishi, R/o B-18, Greater Kailash, Second Floor, New Delhi, aged 29 years is stated to have fallen down from the 6th floor of the said hotel to the 4th floor and is indicated to have been injured on his head thereupon and has been unfit for statement since the date of the incident, i.e., 16.10.2013 till date. The police of the PS R.K.Puram were informed of the incident at 6:20 a.m. on 17.10.2013 by Head Constable Sukhbir No.1233/SE, Police Station C. R. Park telephonically to the effect that the said Mr.Gaurav Rishi had fallen down from the stairs of the Hyatt Regency Hotel and had been admitted to the Fortis Hospital with MLC No.2240/13 and that an Investigating Officer be sent whereupon the information was recorded vide DD No.8A dated 17.10.2013 by the police of Police Station R.K.Puram, and ASI Prem Singh was informed telephonically of the same by HC Bharat Bhushan No.1889/SD, the Duty Officer, posted at the Police Station R.K. Puram.

3. ASI Prem Singh on receipt of this information vide DD No. 8A along with Ct. Rajbir Singh 2015/SD reached the Fortis Hospital at Vasant Kunj, New Delhi and obtained the MLC No.2240/13 of the injured Gaurav Rishi who had fallen down from the stairs in the Hyatt Regency Hotel and the doctor declared him unfit for statement and also mentioned on the MLC that on local examination the injured was found bleeding from the left side with a head injury and one lacerated wound on left tempera parietal region 4 cm X.05 cm. hematoma and swelling around the wound, periodontal hematoma and swelling on left side. The Investigating Officer is indicated to have detailed the contents of the injuries mentioned in the MLC in the rukka prepared by him. On reaching the Fortis Hospital, Ms. Gauri Rishi, the sister of the injured was present at the hospital and stated that she herself was unable to make a statement at that time till Gaurav Rishi gained conciousness and the Investigating Officer met no other eyewitness at the spot whereafter the Investigating Officer along with an accompanying constable reached the spot, i.e., the Hyatt Regency Hotel where he met Vishal Rana, the Assistant Security Manager, who informed the Investigating Officer on inquiry, that the injured Gaurav Rishi had fallen from the stairs of the 6th Floor on to the terrace of the 4th Floor but stated that he (Vishal) himself was not an eyewitness of the occurrence. The Investigating Officer on reaching the terrace of the 4th Floor found dried blood and the Crime Team of the South Di



Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top