SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MANMOHAN, SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
Dharmendra Kumar Tandon – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Manu Sharma with Ms. Ridhima Mandhar, Mr. Kartik Khanna, Mr. Vijay Singh, Mr. Arjun Kakkar and Ms. Nishruta, Advocates
For the Respondent: Mr. Rajat Katyal, APP

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J.

Present appeal has been filed by the appellant-accused challenging the judgment as well as order on sentence both dated 4th September, 2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in Sessions Case No.12/2013 arising from FIR No.147/2012 under Sections 302/307/452 IPC and Sections 25/54/59 of Arms Act registered with PS Rajinder Nagar, whereby the appellant-accused has been convicted under Sections 302/307/452 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment under Section 302 IPC and imprisonment for seven years under Sections 307/452 IPC.

Relevant Facts

2. The relevant facts of the present case are that one Sangeeta Kaur was employed as a maid servant in the house of the deceased-Dr. Sanjeev Dhawan and also used to reside in his house viz. House No.49/50 (Basement, Ground and First Floor), New Rajinder Nagar. It is alleged that the appellant-accused, a former armyman married to Mrs. Ramin Tandon, contacted the deceased-Dr. Sanjeev Dhawan telephonically and at his office, i.e., Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, demanding that his ‘wife’ S

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top