VED PRAKASH VAISH, MOHD.FAIZ ALAM KHAN
Ranjeet @ Jamidar – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Ved Prakash Vaish, J.—Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Dwivedi, learned amicus curiae for the appellant and Sri Pankaj Kumar Tiwari, learned Addl. G.A. for the State.
2. This appeal is directed against the judgment and order dated 22nd December, 2001 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge, Essential Commodities Act, Sultanpur, in Sessions Trial No.353 of 1996 titled as State vs. Ranjeet @ Jamidar, whereby the appellant has been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred to as “I.P.C.”) and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life and to pay fine for a sum of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The appellant has also been convicted for the offence under Section 324 of I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for three years and to pay fine for a sum of Rs.5,000/-, in default of payment of fine to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months.
3. The facts as unfolded during trial of the case are that the complainant, Ram Bahadur Yadav S/o Dwarika Prasad lodged a complaint on 15.05.1996, in which, he stated that on the int
Marudanal Augusti vs. State of Kerala
Ishwar Singh vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Mukeshbhai Gopalbhai Barot vs. State of Gujarat
Sri Bhagwan vs. State of Uttar Pradesh
Nijjam Faraghi alias Nijjam Faruqui vs. State of West Bengal
Khushal Rao v. State of Bombay
Paparambaka Rosamma and Others v. State of A.P.
Laxman Vs. State of Maharashtra
Nallapati Sivaiah Vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Guntur, Andhra Pradesh
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.