SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

A.K.SRIVASTAVA
Amit Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Hariram Ahirwar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant in CRA No.3430/2018: Shri Anil Khare, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Bhaskar Pandey, learned counsel
For the Appellant in CRA No.3533/2018: Shri A.K. Dixit, learned counsel
For the Appellant in CRA No.3554/2018: Shri Siddharth Kumar Sharma, learned counsel
For the Applicant in MCrC No.24031/2018: Shri Manish Datt, learned Senior Counsel with Shri Siddharth Kumar Sharma, learned counsel
For the Petitioner in MCrC No.15517/2019: Shri Ashish Kurmi, learned counsel
For the Petitioner in MCrC No.19244/2019: Shri Girish Tiwari, learned counsel
For the Respondents: Shri K.S. Patel, learned PL
For the Complainant in CRA No.3430/2018, CRA No.3533/2018 and MCrC No.15517/2019: Shri N.P. Choudhary, learned counsel

ORDER

Akhil Kumar Srivastava, J.—At the request of the learned counsel of both the parties, the matter has been heard finally at motion hearing stage.

2. Since all the above petitions have arisen out of a common order of cognizance dated 12/04/2018 passed by the Special Court, Sagar under SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989, they were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

3. These are the petitions, rather appeals, under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for brevity, the Act’). The petitioners are praying for quashing of order dated 12.04.2018 passed by learned Special Judge (Atrocities), Sagar in unregistered complaint case, by which cognizance of the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 472 of the IPC and Sections 3(1)(v) and 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 has been taken against Smt. Nirmala, the appellant in Criminal Appeal No.3554/2018 and Sharad Kumar, the petitioner in MCrC No.24031/2018 whereas cognizance of the offence punishable under Section 120B of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top