State of M. P. VS Irfan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

VIVEK RUSIA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Irfan – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
Shri Pushyamitra Bhargava, learned Addl. Advocate General for appellant/State.
Shri Amit Dube, learned counsel and Shri Noor Ahmad Sheikh, learned counsel for respondent/appellant Irfan.
Shri Z.A. Khan, learned Senior counsel with Shri R.R. Bhatnagar, learned counsel for respondent/appellant Asif.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

VIVEK RUSIA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLAState of M. P. – AppellantVersusIrfan – Respondent

Cases Referred (18)

VIVEK RUSIA, SHAILENDRA SHUKLA
State of M. P. – Appellant
Versus
Irfan – Respondent