JUDGMENT

Umesh Chandra Sharma, J.—At the outset, it is clarified that accused-respondent no. 2 – Saggal and respondent no. 3 Bhaggu have died during the pendency of the appeal, thus the appeal filed against them have been abated vide order dated 08.04.2022, henceforth the Court is proceeding to decide the appeal against surviving respondent.

2. Heard Shri Ratan Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State, Shri Virendra Singh, learned counsel for the accused-respondent and gone through the entire court record with the assistance of the respective counsels.

3. The instant appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 02.03.1984 passed by Assistant Sessions Judge, Mirzapur, in Sessions Trial No. 156 of 1982 arising out of Case Crime No. 227 of 1981, under Section 307 I.P.C., whereby, the deceased accused persons Bhaggu and Saggal and alive accused-respondent have been acquitted.

4. In brief the State of U.P. has pleaded in appeal that judgment and order of acquittal is wholly illegal and erroneous and against the law. Learned Trial Court has not assessed the prosecution evidence appropriately and has not considered the facts and circumstances of the case and material on recor