SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

K.SURENDER
State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Dasari Murali – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Learned Public Prosecutor

JUDGMENT

State is the appellant herein questioning the acquittal recorded vide judgment dated 07.06.2019 in S.C.No.209 of 2012 acquitting the respondent/accused for the alleged offences under Section 417, 376 and 506 of IPC by the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases relating to Atrocities Against Women, Khammam (for short ‘the Sessions Court’)

2. Briefly, the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant/P.W.1 filed a complaint on 11.10.2009 stating that she was married to one Nagaraju seven years prior to the complaint. After one year, they got separated before the village elders due to marital discord. Eight months prior to complaint, she got acquainted with the respondent and developed physical intimacy on the belief that he would marry her. P.W.1 also provided Rs.10,000/- to the respondent/accused. She was carrying 4th month pregnancy and when asked to marry, the respondent/accused refused, for which reason complaint/Ex.P1 was filed.

3. The Sessions Court, during the course of trial, examined P.Ws.1 to 10 and marked Exs.P1 to P9 produced by the prosecution in support of its case.

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that Sessions Court committed a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top