SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Telangana) 371

K. SURENDER
State of Telangana – Appellant
Versus
Dasari Murali – Respondent


JUDGMENT :

K. SURENDER, J.

1. State is the appellant herein questioning the acquittal recorded vide judgment dated 07.06.2019 in S.C. No. 209 of 2012 acquitting the respondent/accused for the alleged offences under Section 417, 376 and 506 of IPC by the Special Sessions Judge for Trial of Cases relating to Atrocities Against Women, Khammam (for short ‘the Sessions Court’)

2. Briefly, the case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant/PW-1 filed a complaint on 11.10.2009 stating that she was married to one Nagaraju seven years prior to the complaint. After one year, they got separated before the village elders due to marital discord. Eight months prior to complaint, she got acquainted with the respondent and developed physical intimacy on the belief that he would marry her. PW-1 also provided Rs. 10,000/- to the respondent/accused. She was carrying 4th month pregnancy and when asked to marry, the respondent/accused refused, for which reason complaint/Ex.P1 was filed.

3. The Sessions Court, during the course of trial, examined PWs. 1 to 10 and marked Exs.P1 to P9 produced by the prosecution in support of its case.

4. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that Sessions Court

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top