Sandeep VS State of Uttarakhand

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate
For the Respondent:Mr. V.K. Jemini, Deputy Advocate General assisted by Ms. Meena Bisht, Brief Holder for the State

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J.—Instant appeal is preferred against the judgment and order dated 06.04.2016, passed in Special Sessions Trial no. 21 of 2014, State Vs. Sundeep by the Court of District and Sessions Judge, Pauri Garhwal. By the impugned judgment and order, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 363, 376, 506 IPC and Section 5(l)/6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short, “the Act”) and sentenced as hereunder:—

(i) Under Section 363 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of three years with a fine of Rs.3000/-. In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of three months.

(ii) Under Section 376 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with a fine of Rs.5,000/- In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of six months.

(iii) Under Section 506 IPC, rigorous imprisonment for a period of one year with a fine of Rs. 1000/- In default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a further period of one month.

(iv) Under Section 5(l)/6 of the Act, rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years with a fine of Rs.5,000/- In default o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

RAVINDRA MAITHANISandeep – AppellantVersusState of Uttarakhand – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent