SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAVINDRA MAITHANI
Ishwari Rana – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate
For the State of Uttarakhand: Mr. V.S. Rawat, Brief Holder

JUDGMENT

Ravindra Maithani, J.—The instant appeal has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 05.04.2019, passed by the Special Judge, POCSO/Sessions Court, Tehri Garhwal, District Tehri Garhwal, in Special Sessions Trial No.18 of 2018, State of Uttarakhand Vs. Ishwari Rana (“the case”). By the impugned judgment and order, the appellant has been convicted under Sections 363, 366 and 376(2)(n) IPC and Section 5(l)read with Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (“the Act”). The appellant has been convicted and sentenced as hereunder:—

(a) Under Section 363 IPC, three years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment for a period of three months.

(b) Under Section 366 IPC, three years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 5,000/-. In default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment for a period of three months.

(c) Under Section 376(2)(n) IPC, ten years’ rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs. 10,000/-. In default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment for a period of six months.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. Fac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top