NIKHIL S.KARIEL
Salimbhai Ibrahimbhai Mir – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
ORDER (ORAL)
Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. Nirupam Nanavaty for the applicant and learned Additional Public Prosecutor Mr. L. B. Dabhi on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. By way of this application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant prays for being released on anticipatory bail in connection with FIR No. 11218009220115 of 2022 registered with Kamlabaug Police Station, District Porbandar on 19.03.2022 for offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4, 6 and 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012.
A. Learned Senior Advocate Mr. Nanavati would take this Court through the FIR as well as the affidavit filed by the Investigating Officer before the learned Sessions Court and the order passed by the learned Sessions Court and would submit that while initially when the prosecutrix had appeared before the concerned Police Station, the case of the prosecutrix was that she had traveled from Porbandar out of her own volition to Chotila and from Chotila she had gone to Gandhinagar where she had gone to the house of the applicant and upon the daughter of the applicant calling up the
Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors.
Anticipatory bail can be granted keeping in view old age and medical condition of accused.
The court determined that continued consensual relations between parties undermined allegations of coercion, allowing bail based on absence of credible evidence of force.
The court emphasized a reformative approach for young offenders, prioritizing rehabilitation over punitive measures, especially in cases involving serious allegations against minors.
The court emphasized a reformative approach for young offenders, balancing the seriousness of allegations with the potential for rehabilitation, particularly in cases involving minors.
Grant of anticipatory bail based on the factual matrix, conduct of the parties, and lack of threat perception from the prosecutrix.
The court emphasized that voluntary relationships and proximity to adulthood can influence bail decisions, reaffirming the necessity of evaluating the risk of evidence tampering and witness intimidat....
The court emphasized a reformative approach for young offenders, balancing the seriousness of allegations with the potential for rehabilitation.
Inducement to have a physical relationship by promising marriage must have a clear nexus with moment promise of marriage cannot be held out as an inducement for engaging in sex over a protracted and ....
The consensual nature of a relationship and the age of the prosecutrix are crucial factors in considering bail applications in cases involving charges under the POCSO Act.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.