SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VIVEK SINGH THAKUR
Rajinder Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Pushpa Devi – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. G.R. Palsra, Advocate
For the Respondent:Ms. Maan Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Instant Revision Petition has been preferred against the judgment dated 26.10.2021 passed by Learned Additional Sessions Judge, Kullu, District Kullu, in Criminal Appeal No. 35 of 2019 titled as Rajinder Kumar versus Pushpa Devi, whereby judgment dated 16.11.2019 passed by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Manali, in Criminal Case No. 192 of 2017, titled as Pushpa Devi versus Rajinder Kumar has been affirmed, wherein petitioner has been convicted under Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act (NI Act) and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment of four months and to pay fine of Rs. 50,000/- payable to the respondent-complainant as compensation.

2. Petitioner against amount of compensation of Rs. 50,000 has deposited Rs. 15,000/- in the trial Court and Rs. 40,000/- in the Registry of this Court and as such, he has deposited Rs. 55,000/- against amount of compensation of Rs. 50,000/-.

3. Petitioner had expressed his willingness for compounding the case by making payment additional payment of 10% of awarded compensation. To show his bonafide he was permitted to deposit Rs. 5,000/- in the Registry of this Court in addition to compensation amount. However, under instruction

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top