SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V. R. K. KRUPA SAGAR
Ganja Srinivas – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. , Rep. by P. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:T.S.N. Murthy, Advocate
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor

ORDER

This Criminal Revision Case under Sections 397 and 401 Cr.P.C. assails the conviction of the revision petitioner for the offence under Section 354 I.P.C. which was initially handed down by a judgment dated 31.03.2008 by learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Ramachandrapuram in Sessions Case No.333 of 2006 and thereafter confirmed in appeal by a judgment dated 16.09.2008 by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavari, Rajahmundry in Criminal Appeal No.180 of 2008. Respondent herein is the State.

2. The assault or criminal force to a woman or a girl with an intention to outrage her modesty is punishable under Section 354, I.P.C. The accusation for such an offence is very easy to make and very difficult to rebut. Therefore, it is always felt necessary by Courts to see that the conduct of the victim is consistent with ordinary probabilities and independent corroboration is normally insisted upon. The entire surr-ounding circumstances require appreciation.

3. Crime No.77 of 2006 was investigated into by Sub-Inspector of Police, Draksharama Police Station and that resulted in filing a police report in terms of Section 173 Cr.P.C. alleging offence under Section 376 read with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top