HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
S.G. Chattopadhyay, J.
Sri Purnendu Aich - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura - Respondent
Crl. Rev. P No. 03 of 2021
Decided On : 19-04-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to prior conviction and sentence (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background and preliminary investigation details (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. trial proceedings and evidence presented (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. arguments regarding witness credibility and defense claims (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. elements of offense under section 354 ipc (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 6. affirmation of conviction and sentence review (Para 30 , 34) |
JUDGMENT AND ORDER
1. By means of filing this criminal revision petition, petitioner Purnendu Aich has challenged the judgment and order dated 17.02.2020 passed by the Sessions Judge, Gomati Judicial District, Udaipur in Criminal Appeal No.33 of 2019.
Petitioner was convicted under Section 354 IPC and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment (R.I) for a term of one year with default stipulation by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class by judgment and order dated 14.08.2019 delivered in PRC(WP) No.24 of 2019. He appealed against the order in the court of the Sessions Judge at Udaipur. The learned Sessions Judge by the impugned judgment affirmed his conviction under Section 354 IPC but reduced his sentence from rigorous imprisonment (R.I) for a term of one year to rigorous imprisonment (R.I) for a term of six months with default stipulation which is under challenge in this criminal revision.
2. Heard Mr. D. K. Das Chowdhury, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Mr. S. Debnath, learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.
3. Factual background of the case is as under: Father of the victim (name withheld) lodged a written FIR with the Officer-in-Charge of R. K. Pur Women Police Station on 09.01.2019 alleging, inter alia, that her 16 years' old victim daughter who was a Madhyamic candidate had taken a room on rent in the house of the accused for prosecuting her studies from there. On 08.01.2019 at about 9.30 pm when the victim was studying in her room, accused knocked on her door and asked her to open the door which was closed from inside. Soon after she opened the door, accused made an entry into her room and embraced her. He also caught hold of her hand and tore her chain. When she cried for help, accused left. Immediately thereafter she informed her father about the incident over his cell phone. He arrived and rescued his daughter from there. On the following day he reported the matter to police by lodging the FIR.
4. Based on his FIR, R. K. Pur Women P.S case No.2019 WP 002 under Sections 448 , 427 and 354 IPC and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 was registered and the case was taken up by woman Sub-Inspector of police Smt. Shova Rani Teli for investigation.
5. In the course of her investigation, the Investigating Officer visited the crime scene. She had drawn up a hand sketch map of the crime scene with a separate index indicating the material locations of the crime scene. Thereafter she met the victim and her father, examined them and recorded their police statements under Sections 161 Cr. P.C. She also recorded the police statements of other witnesses acquainted with the facts of the case and seized the Permanent Resident Certificate of the victim from the possession of her mother which indicated that victim was born on 06.01.2001. During investigation, victim was also produced in Court before a Judicial Magistrate of the First Class at Udaipur who recorded her statement under section 164(5) Cr. P.C (Exbt.3). Having found sufficient materials against the accused, the Investigating Officer laid charge sheet against him for having committed offence punishable under Sections 448 , 427 and 354 IPC.
6 Cognizance of offence was taken and trial commenced with the framing of charges punishable under Sections 448 and 354 IPC against the accused. Accused pleaded not guilty to the said charges and desired to stand the trial.
7. In the course of trial prosecution examined 11 witnesses in all. Among them PW-1 is the scribe of the FIR. PW-2 is a teacher of the school where the v
Govind Ramji Jadhav Vrs. State of Maharastra; reported in (1990) 4 SCC 718
Sahab Singh Vrs. State of Haryana; reported in (1990) 2 SCC 385
State of Madhya Pradesh Vrs. Vikram Das: reported in (2019) 4 SCC 125
Surendra Singh Rautela Vrs. State of Bihar; reported in (2002) 1 SCC 266
Tarkeshwar Sahu Vrs. State of Bihar reported in (2006) 8 SCC 560
Vidyadharan Vrs. State of Kerala reported in (2004) 1 SCC 215: (AIR 2004 SC 536)
A landlord's unwelcome entry into a tenant's room and use of criminal force to touch her body constitutes an offense under Section 354 IPC, affirming the principle that intention can be inferred from....
The court upheld the conviction under Section 354 IPC, concluding that the appellant's actions constituted an outrage of modesty, supported by the victim's testimony and corroborating evidence.
The court found that where evidence is insufficient and there are contradictions in victim testimony, doubts benefit the accused, leading to the quashing of conviction under non-compoundable offences....
Conviction under IPC can rely solely on the victim's testimony if credible, but all sentences must adhere to minimum statutory requirements.
The conviction under Section 354 IPC was upheld based on the credible testimony of the victim, while the sentence was reduced from five to three years due to mitigating circumstances.
Substantive sentence can be reduced if incident is old one.
The absence of independent witnesses does not negate the reliability of a victim's testimony, and minor discrepancies do not undermine the core of the case.
In cases of alleged offenses under Section 354 IPC, the prosecution must establish the charge beyond reasonable doubt, and testimonies of victims carry significant weight, with delays in lodging FIR ....
Procedural lapses in the recording of victim statements do not invalidate the prosecution's case if sufficient evidence independently establishes guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.