SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
Sushil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State GNCTD Through SHO – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP with SI Rakesh Kumar, P.S. Tigri

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

Tushar Rao Gedela, J.—[The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid mode]

Crl.M.A. 9811/2023 (Exemption)

Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

Crl.M.C. 2595/2023

3. This is a petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., 1973 seeking setting aside of the order dated 03.01.2023 passed by the learned Trial Court in CIS SC No.80/2020 arising out of the FIR No.92/2019, Police Station Tigri, for the offences under Section 354/354A/354D IPC, 1860 and Section 12 POCSO Act challenging the dismissal of the application under Section 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recall of PW1 for the purposes of cross examination.

4. Mr. Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that PW1 was present for recording of evidence on 17.12.2021, however, due to the inability of the counsel for the petitioner from appearing on 17.12.2021 and also for the reason that though the proxy counsel was present before the learned Trial Court seeking adjournment, the learned Trial Court did not grant adjournment and proceeded to record the evidence and closed the evidence of PW1. Learned counsel submits that after 17.12.2021, the other witness

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top