SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

RAI CHATTOPADHYAY
Nitya Gopal Pal – Appellant
Versus
State of West Bengal – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Apalak Basu and Ms. Snehal Seth, Advocates
For the Respondent:Mr. Pravas Bhattacharyya and Mr. Mirza Firoj Ahmed Begg, Advocates

JUDGMENT

Rai Chattopadhyay, J.—Appellants are the two convicted persons in Sessions Trial No.03/October/2006, in the Court of Additional District & Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court at Bolpur, Birbhum. The appellants have been convicted under Sections 498A and 304B of the IPC. The impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence of the Trial Court is dated April 30, 2012, which is challenged in this appeal.

2. In this appeal this Court is to adjudicate firstly, the propriety of the impugned judgment of the Trial Court as above in so far as whether the trial Court has duly and appropriately invoked provisions under Section 304B of the IPC, along with Section 498A thereof to find the appellants as convicts, that whether the trial Court has duly invoked and applied presumption under Section 113B of the Cr.P.C, that whether the trial Court has duly and appropriately scrutinized the evidence on record to come to the finding as regards proof of the basic ingredients of offence under Section 304B as well as 498A of the IPC and applied the presumption under Section 113B of the E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top