S. A. DHARMADHIKARI, S. A. DHARMADHIKARI
Mukesh Kumar Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. This Criminal Appeal under Section 374 (2) Cr.P.C. has been preferred by the appellant being aggrieved by the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 07.11.1998 passed by learned Second ASJ Katni, District Katni in S.T. No. 621/1997 whereby the learned ASJ has convicted the appellant for the offence punishable under Section 498-A, 304-B of Indian Penal Code (hereinafter referred as 'IPC') as well as Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act 1961 (hereinafter referred as 'Act 1961'). Since, offence under Section 498-A of IPC and 3/4 of the Act 1961 occurred in the course of the same transaction, the trial Court sentenced him under Section 304-B of IPC to undergo R.I. for seven years with fine of Rs. 5000/-. Default stipulation has also been imposed by trial Court.
2. According to prosecution case, on 18.08.1997 information regarding unnatural death of deceased by burn was reported to police by the appellant. Police registered the marg intimation report and inquired the matter. During inquiry, police conducted the post-mortem of the deceased as well as recorded the statements of witnesses whereby it was revealed that marriage of deceased Rupa Gupta was solemnized with appellan
Bansi Lal vs. State of Haryana
Raman Kumar vs. State of Punjab
Rohtash Kumar vs. State of Haryana
State of U.P. vs. Ramesh Prasad Misra [(1996) 10 SCC 360 : 1996 SCC (Cri) 1278 : AIR 1996 SC 2766]
The judgment established the need for a proximate and live link between dowry harassment and the woman's death, and emphasized the statutory presumption of dowry death under Section 113-B of the Evid....
The court affirmed the conviction under Section 304-B IPC, establishing that the deceased was subjected to cruelty for dowry demands, leading to her suicide, thus satisfying the legal requirements fo....
The burden lies on the prosecution to establish the ingredients of Sec. 304-B, and once proved, the presumption under Sec. 113-B comes into play. The accused can then attempt to displace the deemed c....
The prosecution must prove cruelty or harassment for dowry demand soon before death to sustain a conviction under Sections 304-B and 498-A IPC; insufficient evidence leads to acquittal.
Dowry death – Mere death of deceased being unnatural in matrimonial home within seven years of marriage will not be sufficient to convict accused under Section 304B and 498A of IPC.
The court upheld conviction for dowry death, emphasizing that evidence of torture and demand for dowry proven leads to presumption of causation under relevant legal provisions.
Conviction upheld - Dowry death - there was persistent demand of dowry made by accused from the victim who was used to subjected to cruelty and harassment for such demand and ultimately she had ended....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.