SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ALOK KUMAR VERMA
Faeem – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Applicant:Mr. Mohd. Matlub, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. M.K. Chand, AGA

JUDGMENT

Alok Kumar Verma, J.—Present Application has been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail in connection with the Case Crime No.148 of 2019, registered at police station Rajpur, District Dehradun.

2. Present applicant is in judicial custody under Sections 342, 395, 398, 412, 506, 420, 468, 471, 120B and Section 201 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

3. First Bail Application (No.236 of 2021) was rejected on 23.07.2021. The Second Bail Application (No.186 of 2021) was treated as the Short Term Bail Application and the applicant was granted short term bail for a period of twenty five days on 12.11.2021.

4. As per the case of the prosecution, informant and his wife were present in their house on 22.09.2019. At about 08:15 p.m., four unknown persons entered the informant’s bed room showing gun to two servants of the informant. They confined the informant, his wife and servants and committed robbery of cash and jewellery. The First Information Report was registered against the unknown persons on 23.09.2019 at 12:50 hrs.

5. During investigation, applicant was arrested on 02.07.2020 and on 07.07.2020, Rs.5,460/-, a gold chain and a wr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top