SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

JAMMU AND KASHMIR HIGH COURT
N. Kotishwar Singh, CJ. and MA Chowdhary, J.
[Through Video Conferencing]
Jahangir Ahmed Dar – Appellant
versus
Union Territory of J&K through Principal Secretary to Government and Ors. – Respondents
LPA No.12 of 2023 in WP(C) No.732 of 2022
Decided on 12.2.2024

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. Usman Gani, Advocate
For the Respondents: Mr. Sajjad Ashraf, Dy AG

IMPORTANT POINT
Preventive detention – Non-reflection of granting of bail in favour of detenu is not fatal to detention order.

Headnote:

Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1988 – Section 3 – Preventive detention – Proximate or live link between activities of appellant/petitioner and detention order – Delay cannot be said to be such an inordinate so as to say that link in meanwhile snapped so as to vitiate detention order – Non-reflection of granting of bail in favour of appellant/petitioner is also not fatal to detention order as it had been sufficiently recorded by Commissioner while ordering detention that he was arrested and involvement in commission of case regarding which FIR has been registered – Contention with regard to vague grounds is also out of relevance as there is a specific allegation against appellant/petitioner that he was arrested while having in his possession some narcotic and that discreet reports of field agencies, also revealed that he was involved in Illicit Trafficking of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, which is a serious issue effecting UT of J&K – Having regard to geo-political location of UT of Jammu & Kashmir bordering hostile neighbouring Countries, which have been pushing drugs to this part of Country not only for illegal trade but to use proceeds thereof in sustenance of cross border terrorism – No perversity or illegality in judgment passed by Single Judge. (Paras 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20)

Result: Appeal dismissed.

JUDGMENT

MA Chowdhary, J.—This intra court appeal has been preferred by the appellant Jahangir Ahmed Dar against the judgment/order dated 30.12.2022 passed by the learned Single Bench of this Court in a Writ Petition WP(Crl) No. 732/2022 titled “Jahangir Ahmed Dar vs UT of J&K & Ors,” whereby his plea to quash Order No. DIVCOM-K/279/22 dated 19.10.2022 (for short “detention order”) passed in terms of the Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1988 by the Divisional Commissioner Kashmir (hereinafter called “the Commissioner”).

2. The appellant/petitioner vide detention order dated 19.10.2022, had been directed to be detained in preventive custody, in terms of Section 3 of the Prevention of Illicit Trafficking in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act 1988 by the Commissioner. The appellant/petitioner while challenging the order passed by the Commissioner had contented in his petition that he had been implicated falsely in case FIR No. 04/2021 for the commission of offences punishable under sections 8/20 NDPS Act and in that case he had been admitted to bail by the Court of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Srinagar, besides plea that he was suffering from ailments of constipation and bleeding. The detention order was also assailed that the grounds of detention were vague on the basis of which no prudent man can make an effective representation and if the impugned order of detention is allowed to be executed, the same will result in grave economic crisis to the petitioner as he may loose his job; that no fresh activity as alleged in the grounds of detention and that the impugned order has been passed in hot haste.

3. The respondents filed their reply before the writ Court asserting that the appellant/petitioner was a hardcore drug peddler who had been instigating/motivating immature youth in his area to indulge in drug addiction and drug peddling and that in view of the past conduct of the appellant/petitioner having immoral and illegal criminal tendencies, he had been directed to be taken into preventive custody, with further allegation that he was trading in narcotic substances, sells the same to youth, drivers and college going students, as such, his activities were required to be curbed.

4. The learned Single Judge vide impugned judgment after discussing and relying upon the law laid down in “Government of India & Ors vs Alka Subhah Gadia, (1992) Supp (1) SSC 496” and “Subhash Popatlal Dave vs Union of India & Anr., reported as (2012) 7 SCC 533”, rejected the plea of the appellant/petitioner for quashing of the order of detention impugned in the writ petition.

5. The appellant/petitioner having been aggrieved of the order impugned passed by the learned Single Judge challenged the same through the medium of this appeal, on the grounds that the grounds of challenge pleaded in the Writ Petition were not appreciated as no reference has been made thereof; that the judgment is perverse both on facts and law; that note of the fact that the last alleged activity was in the month of March 2021, whereas the order of detention was passed in October 2021; that the appellant/petitioner was already on bail at the time of passing of the detention order which clearly reflected non-application of mind on the part of the Detaining Authority to most of the material and vital facts vitiating the requisite satisfaction; that there was no justification with the Detaining Authority to pass the detention order that there being no live link or any fresh activity; that the learned Single Judge has not appreciated the important issues involved in the matter and passed the impugned order contrary to the well settled principles of law and that the detention order passed on 19.10.2022 had not been executed till date nor the respondents have taken any steps to seek execution of detention order in accordance with law despite the fact that the appellant/petitioner was all along available for executio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top