GITA GOPI
Kadarsha Latifsha Saiyed Thro Jamilsha Kadarsha Saiyed – Appellant
Versus
State of Gujarat – Respondent
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent – State.
2. By way of this application filed under Section 379 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to in short as ‘Cr.P.C.’), the challenge is made to the legality and validity of the order dated 07.06.2024 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Mandvi, Kutch in Criminal Miscellaneous Application No.166 of 2024 whereby the application preferred by the respondent authority under Section 439(2) of the Cr.P.C. came to be allowed and the regular bail granted in favour of the applicant was cancelled. Further, the applicant alongwith the other co-accused were ordered to be taken into custody and an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- deposited as per the suspension of condition for a limited period was ordered to be forfeited. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied with the same, the applicant has come in this Criminal Revision Application contending the impugned order passed is unjust, improper and against the settled legal position of law.
3. As per the facts of the case, an First Information Report (FIR) came to be
Dolat Ram vs. State of Haryana
Gurcharan Singh and Ors. vs. State (Delhi Administration)
Merubhai Ramabhai Khodiyatar (Hun) Rabari vs. State of Gujarat
(1) Cancellation of bail – Bail once granted should not be cancelled in a mechanical manner without considering whether any supervening circumstances have rendered it no longer conducive to a fair tr....
Bail should not be cancelled without substantial justification, and courts must consider the circumstances surrounding compliance with bail conditions.
Bail cancellation requires clear evidence of breach or supervening circumstances; implied conditions cannot justify cancellation.
The accused's indefeasible right to default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the importance of considering supervening circumstances justifying the cancellation of bail.
The court has the authority to cancel bail if the order suffers from serious infirmities resulting in miscarriage of justice, and if the accused misuses their liberty, interferes with the investigati....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the misuse of bail and the legal principles governing the cancellation of bail.
The court emphasized the limitations on the court's power to cancel bail and the need for strong and substantive reasons to arrest a person who is set at liberty by admitting him to bail.
Bail should not be cancelled without clear evidence of violation of conditions or misuse of liberty, as established by the court's analysis.
Bail may be cancelled if the accused violates conditions by engaging in further criminal activity, with the court needing to assess the seriousness and context of such violations.
Cancellation of bail requires cogent evidence of supervening circumstances; mere subsequent charges do not automatically justify cancellation if they do not affect the original trial.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.