P. Kulanthaisamy VS K. Murugan

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

K. MURALI SHANKAR
P. Kulanthaisamy – Appellant
Versus
K. Murugan – Respondent

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mrs. M. Mariya Vinola, Advocate
For the Respondent No.1:Mr. K. Sudalaiyandi, Advocate
For the Respondent No.2:Mr. B. Thanga Aravindh, Government Advocate (Crl. Side)

JUDGMENT

The Criminal Appeal is directed against the judgment made in C.C.No.32 of 2017 dated 04.01.2018 on the file of the Fast Track Magistrate Court, Srivilliputtur, acquitting the respondent for the offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments (hereinafter referred as ‘NI’) Act.

2. The appellant / complainant filed a private complaint under Section 200 Cr.P.C. against the first respondent / accused for the alleged offence under Section 138 r/w 142 of the NI Act.

3. For the sake of convenience and brevity, the parties herein after will be referred to as per their status / ranking in the trial Court.

4. The case of the complainant is that the accused was earlier working in mechanical section of Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred as ‘TNSTC’) depot at Virudhunagar and the complainant had acquaintance with one Madamuthu of Srivilliputtur, who retired after serving in the computer section of TNSTC depot, where the accused was working. The accused informed the complainant that he was holding important post in the Transport Corporation Labour Union and he is having good influence through Labour Union and that he would arrange conductor job to the co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document