A.K.SIKRI
J. N. Bhatia & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
State & Anr. – Respondent
A.K. Sikri, J.— All these cases relate to complaints under Sections 138 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (in short the ‘NI Act’) based on dishonour of cheques. Further, in all these cases, the cheques are issued by and on behalf of a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act or a partnership firm. The complainants, in addition to making the said companies/firms as principal accused, have also impleaded certain other persons in the capacity of their being Directors or partners, as the case may be. Again, in all these cases, some of those Directors or partners have come up and have filed these petitions under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking quashing of summoning orders against them. Plea is also common in these cases. It is either contended they ceased to be the Directors/partners before the cheque(s) was/were presented which got dishonoured and, therefore, since they had no concern with the company/firm as on the date of dishonour of the cheque(s), they could not be arraigned as accused persons. Or else, their contention is that they are not the persons who were incharge and responsible for the business of the company or the firm and,
4.S.M.S. Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. Neeta Bhalla and Another
8.Raj Lakshmi Mills v. Shakti Bhakoo
9.MMTC Ltd. v. Medchl Chemicals and Pharma P. Ltd.
10.V.K. Jain v. Union of India
12.Smt. Katta Sujatha v. Fertilizers and Chem. Travancore Ltd.
17.Everest Advertising Pvt. Ltd. v. State
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.