SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SURESH KAIT
GE Capital Transportation Financial Services – Appellant
Versus
Rashisuddin Khan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Suresh Kait, J.—Vide the instant petition the petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 30.03.2010, whereby, the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi returned the complaint case under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘N.I. Act’), inter alia holding that the complaint is barred by jurisdiction.

2. In the present case as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, the summons have not been issued by learned MM as the complaint filed by the petitioner has been returned on the ground of jurisdiction, therefore, there is not necessity to issue notice to the respondent in the instant petition also. This position has been fortified by the judgment of the constitution bench in the case of Chander Deo Singh v. Prakash Chandra Bose1 wherein the Supreme Court has held that the entire scheme of Chapter XVI of the Code of Criminal Procedure shows that an accused person does not come into the picture at all till the process is issued; and since the very question for consideration being whether he should be called upon to face an accusation, he has no right to take part in the proceedings.

3. Learned counsel for p

































































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top