SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.L.Mehta
Sanjay Aggarwal – Appellant
Versus
G. S. Tayal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.L. Mehta, J.— This petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of criminal complaint No. 80/1 of 2005 under Section 406/420 IPC and also summoning order dated 18th April 2009 of the ACMM, Rohini District Courts, Delhi.

2. Facts in brief necessary for the disposal of this petition are these:

Four complaints under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the Act’) read with Section 415 and 420 IPC were filed by G.S. Tayal, his wife Munni Tayal and his sons Kapil Kumar Tayal and Devendra Kumar Tayal against the petitioners Sanjay Aggarwal, his brother Ajay Aggarwal and their firm M/s Sanjay Steel Tube Company. These complaints were filed in the year 2005. The summoning orders were passed against the aforesaid accused persons under Section 138 of the Act. The complainants filed applications for dropping allegations of Sections 415 and 420 IPC stating that they have filed separate complaints against the accused persons under Section 420 IPC. Vide order dated 3rd June 2011, the learned Magistrate recorded that since the cognizance was taken in the complaints under Section 138 of the Act only, there was no necessity of filing such applications and so h









































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top