SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Mad) 85

BASHEER AHMED SAYEED
IN RE: NACHIMUTHU – Appellant
Versus
. – Respondent


Judgement

Basheer Ahmed Sayeed, J

[1] The petitioner has exhausted all his remedies available to him under the law. His present application is that the sentences that been already passed in four different cases should all be made to run concurrently. His petition in effect is for a review of the orders that have been already passed by the trial Court as well as the Appellate Court.

It is pointed out that there is no provision of law for such a review being entertained in orders passed under the Criminal Procedure Code. If this were a matter of mere clerical error obviously some relief can be given in regard to the sentence.; But this is not so. It is therefore not possible to entertain such an application. The application is devoid of merits and it is therefore dismissed.

Application dismissed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top