SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 97

RAMRATNA SINGH, S.P.SINGH
Naina Sah – Appellant
Versus
Ramrup Sah – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioners have come up to this Court against an order of the Magistrate of Bhagalpur by which he decided a proceeding under Sec.145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure against them. The dispute was in respect of about 6 bighas of land, being one-third of a holding measuring 10 bighas 15 kathas and odd, recorded in the record of rights in the name of one Dhusar Sah. The opposite party, who constituted the first party before the learned Magistrate, were in possession of the remaining two-thirds for a long time. The petitioners, who constituted the second party before the teamed Magistrate, are agnates of the opposite party.

According to the opposite party, the entire holding belonged to, and was in possession of, the ancestors of the parties when they were joint, but it was recorded in the record of rights in the name of Dhusar Sah, who was their benamdar. Subsequently, in 1906, a deed of relinquishment was executed by Dhusar Sah in favour of the joint family properties; and in 1907, the three branches of this family divided the entire holding amongst themselves. The opposite party represented two or these branches. In 1915, the third co-sharer is said to have transfer


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top