SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 110

K.AHMAD
Dhuri Sah – Appellant
Versus
Kishun Prasad Sah – Respondent


Judgment

K.Ahmad, J.

1. The property in, dispute in the present case is a house bearing municipal holding No. 125 of ward No. 8, within the Municipality of Bhagalpur. Admittedly, at one point of time, this was the property of one Anandi Sah. It is not disputed that on the 14th May, 1957, Anandi Sah and the other members of his joint family executed a deed of sale in respect of that house in favour of the plaintiff, who is appellant here, for a consideration of Rs. 5,000/-. It was admitted therein that out of the total consideration of Rs. 5,000/-, a sum of Rs. 2,430.00 was already paid on the 20th April, 1957, by the vendee to the vendors and that the balance of Rs. 2,570.00 was to be paid at the time of the admission of the execution before the Registrar. The admission of the execution of the document was however, done by the two batches of the vendors on two dates. The sons of Anandi Sah admitted the execution before the Registrar on the 16th May, 1957, while their father did it on the 18th May, 1957, before the Registrar at his house. It is not denied that though, in accordanee with the stipulation made in the aforesaid deed of sale, the entire balance of the consideration money,



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top