SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Pat) 97

G.N.PRASAD
Union Of India – Appellant
Versus
Binod Behari Singh – Respondent


Judgment

G.N.Prasad, J.

1. The petitioner, the Union of India as owner of Eastern Railway Administration, had entered into a goods handling contract with the opposite party in December, 1957. The contract contained an arbitration clause, and certain disputes having arisen between the parties, they were referred to the arbitration of the Deputy General Manager of the Railway. In due course, the arbitrator made an award, whereby the opposite party was found to be entitled to receive from the petitioner a sum of Rs. 82,100 in full satisfaction of his dues under the contract. The award which was given on 26-2-1965 was filed in Court on 25-5-1965, and the notice contemplated by Sec.14(2) of the Arbitration Act was served upon the petitioners lawyer on 28-6-1965. Within thirty days thereof, viz., on 24-7-1965, the petitioner filed an objection to the award challenging the same as vitiated on various grounds, such as misconduct, or having been made beyond the scope of the reference to arbitration.

Subsequently, two applications were filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking amendment of its original objection petition dated 24-7-1965. The first amendment petition was filed on 23-9-1965, pr

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top